I'll take anticorrelated isocurvature with tensor modes, please

If you're a cosmologist, you need to rewrite your proposal. Now.

Well, 13,730 million if you have confidence in ground based data... looking through Apache Point apparently puts 40 million years on the universe.

Ok, WMAP-5 release is out, just in time for pedants on panels to quibble about everybody's cosmology related Hubble proposals using dated information.
Hence, clearly, they must be rejected in favour of observations of the local universe which are not sensitive to these parameters...

There is a stack of new, overlong, papers, which I suppose we must all eventually read and then pick one or two to actually cite.

Best of all, there is a handy-dandy summary table of the Officially Approved Parameters for Construction of Universe, release 5.0
as well as a dozen or so TLA'd models Which Will Not Do, At All.

We are at Concordance.
4.6% baryonic mass. 23.3% dark matter, mostly cold. 72.1% of No Clue.

and, we can all be grateful for the Official TLA Decryptor Table

No pretty pictures for my readers!
Get back to writing proposals, now, dammitt.

Sean's take
A pop-sci version

Tags

More like this

"Much later, when I discussed the problem with Einstein, he remarked that the introduction of the cosmological term was the biggest blunder he ever made in his life. But this “blunder,” rejected by Einstein, is still sometimes used by cosmologists even today, and the cosmological constant denoted…
Every so often you will come across somebody who has a "killer" list of "problems" with the Big Bang. While there remain unknowns and questions about the Big Bang— just as there do with biological evolution— the basic picture of the Big Bang is rock solid— just like evolution. Nearly two…
"Scientific discovery and scientific knowledge have been achieved only by those who have gone in pursuit of it without any practical purpose whatsoever in view." -Max Planck Tomorrow morning, at 8 AM my time, the press conference that cosmologists have spent the past decade waiting for will finally…
The precise measurement of the microwave background fluctuations by COBE, followed by the tour de force "concordance cosmology" results of the WMAP mission combined with decades of data on large scale structure, clusters of galaxies and distance ladder calibrations, up to and including type Ia…

I prefer my smudgy, hard to make out bits right up against bright nearby stars instead of in the middle of nowhere. Heck, if you look long enough at a star, you get the galaxies for free :)

Hmmmm. Your favourite choices (ISO1 and TENS) give the correct Omega(baryon) figures for the Riofrio cosmology. Are you perhaps secretly on the side of the crackpots?

I think the cosmologists are just too lazy to conduct a proper parametric study of theory models spaces...

I am however a confirmed adiabaticist, despite a good friend of mine having tried to convert me to the isocurvature heresy at a tender age

Happy Birthday Universe! Where do we celebrate? The Star Wars Bar? Yarrgh! Pass that flask of Klingon Ale this way! We'll all be seeing starstuff by midnight!!