Nordic Economics

More like this

Steve Levitt links to this article by Will Dobbie and Roland Fryer on an educational innovation to improve the education of ethnic minority children. Dobbie and Fryer write: Harlem Children's Zone (HCZ) is arguably the most ambitious social experiment to alleviate poverty of our time. We [Dobbie…
The Dean Dad is worried about remedial math: In a discussion this week with someone who spends most of her time working with students who are struggling mightily in developmental math, I heard an argument I hadn't given much thought previously: students who have passed algebra and even pre-calc in…
Here is a serious problem: Here's the thing, Gabriela: You will never need to know algebra. I have never once used it and never once even rued that I could not use it. You will never need to know—never mind want to know—how many boys it will take to mow a lawn if one of them quits halfway and two…
Atlas Hedged Bankrupt Icelandic gazillionaires and Woe Is Academia Atlas Hedged updating a classic for the modern age - recommended Peek-a-boo - the Economist explains why Astronomers should have lots of new toys. Check Out new SciBling "Confessions of A Science Librarian" PhysioProf's Handy Dandy…

I really don't get the percentage button. And I _really_ don't want my economy controlled by people that seem to think using it makes a difference.

The post is a nice explanation, with quadratic equations, on how you can have bistability in markets as interests rate shift.

But, the equations mix percentages and real fractional returns - ie he types percentage values as constants, but the equations only make sense if the variables are numbers.
Took me a second to see that, because I was evaluating the variable as a real number and the percentage constants were inconsistent.
Makes perfect sense if you calculate the equations using business calculator "percentage function buttons".

Not that deLong needs to, but it speaks to some scary ingrained habits.