Here is an astronomy ranking for the US
CA 46
MD 20
AZ 14
MA 11
NY 7
PA 7
TX 6
WA 6
DC 5
HI 5
MI 5
NJ 5
FL 4
TN 4
IL 3
OH 3
CO 2
GA 2
IN 2
MN 2
NM 2
VA 2
CT 1
MO 1
NV 1
SC 1
WI 1
0 for everyone else
success rates, excluding the zeros, were from 50% for GA to less than 10% for CO.
Anyone who tried 8 or more got some.
About a quarter goes to CA, about twice the mean per capita.
More like this
Joey Bernard, who writes about science under Linux, has just started a multi (as in two?) part series on GSL, the GNU Scientific Library. It is here. Just browsing through the files of GSL is fun.
I'll return to my Dawkins series later in the week. But after all our exertions recently trying to resolve the mysteries of the universe, I find myself in the mood for a straight math post.
I know what you're thinking. You're thinking, “Gosh, it sure is neat that we can generate all Pythagorean triples from one simple formula, but what happens if we try an exponent bigger than two?
As an introduction to a mathematical game, and how you
can use a little bit of math to form a description of the game that
allows you to determine the optimal strategy, I'm going to talk a bit about Nim.
MD seems really overrepresented.
MD would include STScI and NASA-Goddard. So overrepresented? Not so much.
To which absurdly oversubscribed grants/telescope program is this referring?
Hubble observing opportunities?
Think of it as a challenge.
It should be very easy for you, I am pretty sure you personally are a significant fraction of the WA entry!
HST time it is then, which would explain MD. I was assuming it was something newly released (NSF season is coming due, in extragalactic at least). Did you find tasty data somewhere?
Yup, Hubble awards, cycle 16 - in anticipation of the next round.
I was catching up on my backlog of glossy bits of paper while stuck in a tin can hurtling at mach 0.9 10 km up
I have an odd urge to yell "we're number 1, we're number 1"
I'm not stopping you.
On the internet, nobody has to know when you gloat.