Ultra Traiectum

Well, it was a good four centuries or so, but after a good run, one of the older watches on the Rhine is coming to an end.

Word came in mid-June that the Dutch government cuts were going to lead to some "consolidation" in astronomy, and that Utrecht would be cut.
We were asked not to kick up a fuzz about it, for local political reasons, but soon enough the story spread:

One Small Step broke the story,
with the e-Astronomer also chiming in.
Official response of the Astronomical Institute is here.

So, Dutch academia is facing "austerity" - 20% cuts in particular for Utrecht University, and, well, there are five university departments of astronomy...

Amsterdam and Leiden are effectively untouchable, and Groningen has both unique capabilities and regional advantages. So, that leaves Utrecht and Nijmegen.
While there may be no duplication in Dutch astronomy, there are similarities, and Utrecht has history, and SRON, but from what little I know of Dutch regional politics, Nijmegen has the geographical advantage.

So, that is for the Dutch to sort out, and the intent, apparently, is not to cut but consolidate, so presumably equivalent faculty lines and student positions will migrate to the remaining four academic institutions, over the next four years, as Utrecht ramps down. With some Utrecht AI faculty maybe moving, and others maybe staying in physics etc.

But, we can look at output - will there be a net cut of Dutch astronomers, or is this really a consolidation? Time will tell, and of course administrators and politicians can always change their minds.

Have to say though, I'd have figured the Dutch to be the very last people on Earth to cut astronomy.

More like this

A lot of people have asked me to link to and comment on the SUNY Albany cuts and some of the reactions to it by some online academics... To cut a long story short, the SUNY system took another round of cuts, and the President of SUNY Albany decided to cut whole programs rather than keep trimming…
So, what do we make of the NRC Rankings? What drives the different rankings, and what are the issues and surprises? First, the R-rankings really are reputational - they are a bit more elaborate than just asking straight up, but what they reduce to is direct evaluation by respondents without…
As everybody knows, there is one thing you must never do before launch, and that is name it. Total jinx. Not of course that we are superstitious, that'd be silly. Some of us just cringed when the Next Generation Space Telescope was given a proper name by an over keen administrator while still in…
there are many ways to rank a program: including its reputation, its performance, and more subtle quantitative indicators, some of which are contradictory and mutually inconsistent. Rankings are also generally lagging indicators and imperfect indicators of future performance, they are vulnerable to…

"Have to say though, I'd have figured the Dutch to be the very last people on Earth to cut astronomy."

Why is that? Personally, I'm not surprised really they cut astronomy.

By Raskolnikov (not verified) on 07 Jul 2011 #permalink

Because the dutch have been disproportionately strong in astronomy compared to their size and economy for 400 years.
It is arguably the science sector they are best in, although condensed matter physics is also very strong historically.
It has also always been my impression that they have a well organised, and well connected physical science lobby, specifically the astronomers, and that they are usually listened to at government levels.

Be interesting if that has changed, whether due to change in politics, or change in astronomers, or combination thereof.