The Pale Red Dot project has found a planet.
Proxima Centauri is a low mass red dwarf, and is part of a triple system, the other two stars being α Centauri A and B, which are solar like stars in a close orbit around each other.
The whole system is a little over 4 light years away, the nearest stars to the Sun, and Proxima is the closest of the three stars.
α Centauri B was thought to have a planet, but the evidence for that particular planet is looking shaky.
It may have been noise. α Cen A and B were in conjunction, making them hard to observe, but are now separating, and observing campaigns to look for planets around those star are continuing.
ESO researchers, using the radial velocity variability technique, have detected a quite robust signature of a planet with a mass of 1.3 Earth masses, or more, in a 11 day orbit around Proxima Centauri.
Since the Proxima Centauri is almost 1,000 times fainter than the Sun, this puts the putative planet well within the habitable zone of the star, near the inner edge of the zone, but formally inside it.
The planet would most likely be tidally locked to the star, and might either have one face locked to the star (like the Moon to the Earth), or, conceivable, be in a 2:3 tidal lock, like Mercury is with the Sun.
In either case, it is conceivable for this planet to have liquid water on its surface, IF it is has reasonable thickness atmosphere of nice enough composition.
This is the nearest star to the Sun.
It has an Earth like planet orbiting in a nice orbit.
It will be about as easy to characterise as any exoplanet ever.
There really are a lot of exoplanets everywhere, and a lot of them are Earth mass, and a lot of those are in nice orbits.
What a nice Universe.
Next, a nice intense workshop on how to find lots of low mass planets in the habitable zones of lots of stars in the near future.
Should be a fun workshop.
ESO press release - with bonus videos and extra graphics and links.
Two new papers on the topic:
"Proxima Centauri as a Benchmark for Stellar Activity Indicators in the Near Infrared" Paul Robertson et al., ApJ submitted - stellar photometric activity may mimic low amplitude radial velocity variability, and cause false positive signals for candidate planets. This paper looks at multi-band photometry over a long timeline for Proxima Centauri to characterize time scales on which the star varies.
tl;dr there is very little variability on 5-15 day time scales, which makes it very unlikely the planet candidate is a false positive due to stellar variability.
"Effects of Proxima Centauri on Planet Formation in Alpha Centauri" Worth & Sigurdsson, ApJ in press - theory paper by Rachel Worth, my PhD student, on planet formation models for the α Centauri system, taking its putative dynamical history into account.
tl;dr - theoretically there can be planets in the system, few, low mass in close orbits, including around Proxima Centauri. Details could elucidate past history and formation of system.
I have a question. For human and other life to exist, we need elements heavier than Fe. Based upon my knowledge of nucleosynthesis, in order for elements heavier than Fe to exist, the system must be formed from the remnants of a supernova. With some "hand-waving" one can argue that elements up to Pb might not require a supernova to exist. But Iodine which is needed for human life, and can only be formed from a supernova event.
So my question, was Proxima Centauri formed from the remnants of a supernova event? I vaguely remember reading somewhere that Alpha Centauri was NOT made formed from a supernova event.
Thanks in advance for your time.
Great discovery,,,now it remind me of the great, short SF story 'Far Centaurus', which by the way, found out about it here in your blog. Thanks.
The elements with atomic number higher than Fe do indeed primarily come from (type II) supernovae.
The Centauri stellar system is about the same age as the Solar System and actually a little bit more rich in metals. We are not certain if Proxima Centauri is a sibling of α Cen A and B, and it is surprisingly hard to measure its true composition directly, bit it is also quite metal rich.
It did not form directly from a supernova (nor did the Solar System, rather we think the Solar System formation was triggered by the shock from a nearby supernova which added some additional metal debris to the already metal rich gas from which the Solar System formed), but the Centauri system formed from gas which already contained some of the metal debris from dozens of previous generations of supernovae. This would certainly have included, for example, iodine, and in fact we see the spectroscopic signature of essentially all the elements in roughly solar abundance in the Centauri stars. The abundances differ in detail, which is interesting and tells us about the origin and age of the stars, but the composition is approximately the same as that of the Solar System to within about a factor of 2 in most elemental abundances.
Hope that helps.
I gather Stephen Baxter also just did a novel premised on a habitable planet orbiting Prox Cen - called, strangely enough, "Proxima", or so Alastair Reynolds tells me... haven't read it. There is also the old Murray Leinster story about man eating Centaurian intelligent plants...
Thanks for the response. If Iodine is there, then we can survive, although we might need to bring our own artificial lights, for plant life, and for getting a decent tan. I am not sure how much UV a Red Dwarf would output.
So, when do we leave?
Well, first we have to find out what the actual mass and radius of the planet are, and if it has an atmosphere.
There is some hard UV, but not much blue light - interesting tweetstorm on what that means going on right now.
Starshot is planning on leaving for Prox Cen within 20 years, and taking less than 20 years to get there... but unless you can upload to a chip, it won't be taking passengers for a while.
With respect to the Sun, hard UV and X rays are correlated with sunspot activity. I don't know specifically about Proxima Centauri, but many M-class dwarfs show evidence of a strong stellar activity cycle. That might still be OK if the planet has a sufficiently strong intrinsic magnetic field, but if not you don't want to live on the dayside of this planet because stellar energetic particle events will fry you. Even with a magnetic field, you wouldn't want to get too close to the magnetic cusps, for the same reason.
Prox Cen is active - it is moderately active for an M dwarf, with Lx/Lbol ~ 10^-4, with significant flaring. It is apparently a slow rotator, with a measured rotation period of 84 d and a tentative suggestion of magnetic cycle of 7 yrs, but this is challenged in the literature. For a slow rotator the activity is at the high end of the range of activity but not wildly high. There is a discussion in social media about whether the rotation period could be 11 days and the planet signal is actually sunspots. This is a real concern, but there is a careful photometric analysis which shows no power around 5-15 d window and it is very hard to see how you could hide the rotation that well and yet also have it be strong enough to show in the RV.
Particle events would be a concern for possibility of life, and both magnetic field and atmosphere would be critical. Both are in principle measurable...