So says Sahotra Sarkar in the latest American Prospect.
Hat-tip: Neil the Ethical Werewolf
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Biologist and philosopher Sahotra Sarkar is combative, to say the least. When he says what he means, it can hurt physically if you are the target. I almost feel sympathy for Ben Stein...
And knowing one of the principals in this comment, I had to laugh. When Kimbo says he thinks you are full of…
Every time I think that Britney Spears cannot become more trailer trash, she goes and becomes the black hole into which all other trailer trash in the Universe is sucked:
That would be Britney Spears in the latest issue of Bazaar being her very pregnant self.
1) That was disturbing when Demi Moore…
Is intelligent design science, or not? Think carefully before you answer. The modern intelligent design (ID) movement is motivated by theological concerns and trades in on religious authority to meet its aims, but stripped of this background, can ID be relegated to the "junk science" bin? While…
Attendees of the Sarkar-Nelson debate are speaking up at Pandagon and The Ethical Werewolf. As I expected, it sounds like it was a bit of a farce, and that Sarkar did a fine job.
I'm getting a little tired of making this concession every time I speak of him, so let's get it over with. Paul Nelson…
POssibly the best response to this would be "BRing it on!"
All the creationists have with regards to physics is fuzzy wishful thinking, no science at all. The only problem is that some bits of physics, QD and relativity etc, are counter intuitive enough for people to think that they haev disproved them every week. So again, the physicists will have trouble educating the public.
I just wish they'd attack chemistry, (I have a degree in it), since they'd just bounce straight off.