1. clock
  2. Open Notebook Science is more than just Open Access

Open Notebook Science is more than just Open Access

By clock on June 5, 2007.

As explained by Jean-Claude Bradley in this excellent interview: The Pursuit of Automation: Open Notebook Science:

The difference between Bradley's idea and traditional open source projects is the clutter, i.e., all of the data collected from research. In a journal article, what the reader receives is a set of findings, published after peer review, along with the conclusions and basic data used to reach them. Bradley's project allows the reader to see the process unfold, from hypothesis to conclusion, with all data, experiments and notes that are collected along the way. This inclusiveness allows other researchers to better assess their own ideas, because not only do they have the conclusion and data used to support it, but also they have access to every failed or incomplete subset of data to use in their equations.

Tags
open science

More like this

Doing science publicly: Interview with Jean-Claude Bradley
Jean-Claude Bradley and I first met at the First Science Blogging Conference where he led a session on Open Science. We then met at SciFoo and later joined forces on a panel at the ASIS&T meeting and finally met again at the second Science Blogging Conference back in January where Jean-Claude…
New on.... Open Access and Science 2.0
Subscription-supported journals are like the qwerty keyboard: Are there solutions? One reason for optimism is that changing how we pay the costs of disseminating research is not an all-or-nothing change like switching from qwerty to Dvorak keyboards. Some new open-access journals are very…
Useful Chemistry at the '07 NC Science Blogging Conference
Jean-Claude Bradley is the pioneer in the use of blogs in science in the way that too many of us are still too scared to do - posting on a daily basis the ideas, methods and data from the lab. He and his collaborators are using the blogs Useful Chemistry, Useful Chem Experiments 1 and Usefulchem-…
ScienceOnline2010 - interview with Andrea Novicki
Continuing with the tradition from last two years, I will occasionally post interviews with some of the participants of the ScienceOnline2010 conference that was held in the Research Triangle Park, NC back in January. See all the interviews in this series here. You can check out previous years'…

Very interesting post: I'd never heard of open notebook. I'm curious about other legal issues -- not about plagiarism, which seems like small beer if you're committed to open source, but about stability with respect to regulations. The US government has some regulations about things like electronic signatures, etc. -- do these technologies comply with those regulations?

Hermagoras,
You may be thinking about FDA and patent issues with respect to electronic signatures. This is certainly a concern for drug companies and their use of electronic notebooks. There are also certainly issues that arise when dealing with clinical trials and human subjects. But at this point we are just making compounds and running standard assays. If things do progress to animal testing and beyond, we'll be counting on people like Dan Zaharevitz at the National Cancer Institute to advise.