Obama answers science questions

General election is in two months. Both campaigns are in a frenzy. Media is covering it full speed. Even low-information voters are slowly starting to pay attention. At this point, every word every candidate says is analyzed and over-analyzed and can potentially be disastrous if the opposing side spins it in their TV ads. This is not the time to venture into unnecessary topics. Caution is the key.

Nobody who cherishes reason, logic, empiricism and rationality is crazy to vote for the train wreck that is the McCain/Palin ticket. Such people are going to vote for Obama even if they think he is too conservative, or too liberal, or whatever. There is no reason for Obama to spend any time and risk in order to woo such voters.

Yet, he did. He answered the 14 science questions facing America, posed by the ScienceDebate 2008 group. Just the act of doing this shows he is serious about this and understands the importance of science and technology in every policy decision.

As for the answers, some are better than others. He is obviously well informed and understands the broader issues well. Some of the answers are a little vague - but that is to be expected at this point in the debate: each detail will be treated as a "campaign promise" so he has to thread cautiously. If anything, I am impressed how MUCH detail he provided.

For specifics, I agree with criticisms of individual questions written by Revere and Nick. I would also add that I hoped to see more about the way agriculture fits into the Energy policy, i.e., how it can be reformed so as not to be the biggest consumer of oil in the US economy as it is now.

Also see this discussion.

But in general, I am happy. I am looking forward to McCain's promised answers (and how much they are at odds with Palin's known stances as well McCain's own previous responses). Finally, if/when Obama becomes a President, I would like him to do this exercise again - not having an election at stake and knowing he is in charge, perhaps he can provide more detail on his policies as well as mechanisms he'll use to procure funding and to persuade the Congress and the people to let him follow through on these.

Tags

More like this

Note to GOP - ACORN Was Defrauded and You Know It: 1. The GOP during the 70's, 80's and 90's employed a number of methods to register voters to insure the people they were registering were indeed Republican. One method was to go through a neighborhood and register everyone who wasn't registered.…
McCain campaign complained that media is not covering him before they complained that media is covering him. Another example of a debate between John McCain and John McCain? Well, when you have a bad product, it is best not to have it reviewed. There is a reason why crappy movies are not shown to…
Even John McCain's supporters don't care for his campaign's tactics of attacking Obama with lies. Meanwhile, Sarah Palin has referred to her own campaign and its supporters as "atrocious and unacceptable." She told the Christian Broadcasting Network: If I ever were to hear that [threats to…
Hmmm, I have not done one of these in a few weeks, so if you depend on me for your political information, check under the fold: The Terrorist Barack Hussein Obama: From the start, there have always been two separate but equal questions about race in this election. Is there still enough racism in…

Wow. he answered them and showed that he thinks about these issues.

I guess McCain's responses was "What the---???"

Oh, well, I can already see McSame's response:

Q1. I'm more qualified to deal with these issues because I was a POW.

Questions 2 - 15: See Q1.

Anyway, he doesn't know much about science because he was 894th out of 899 in his graduating class.

Doesn't that make you like him more?

he was 894th out of 899 in his graduating class

So five of of his graduating class were even greater mavericks than McCain himself.