How religion generates social conservatism:
You could make a reasonable case that pencils have a purpose, but pencil shavings just exist. But what about elephants? Religious people and children are, of course, more likely than non-religious adults to say that animals exist for a purpose. But what about men and women? Black people and whites? Rich and poor? Arab and Jew? Do these exist for a purpose? And is it possible for one to become another? Gil Diesdendruck and Lital Haber of Bar-Ilan University in Israel decided to find out what children think.
More like this
I just finished Bryan Caplan's The Myth of the Rational Voter. It was excellent, and I will review it when I get around to it.
tags: Central Park turtles, reptiles, Im
Undergrads, we all love'em, right? You bet.
Of course...
Undergraduate Research Assistant Finally Sharpens Perfect Pencil