On media articles linking to scientific papers (and other sources)

There are fascinating threads of comments developing on these two posts:

Science journalism pet peeve


Do arrogant, condescending, and dismissive attitudes contribute to the journalism crisis?

If you have bookmarked the quick guide to the maxims of new media you will easily find the origin of the phrase "Do what you do best and link to the rest." - Jeff Jarvis in this 2007 post.

For the origin of the reluctance of MSM to link outside their own websites, watch this video.

For my own thoughts on this topic, informed by my experiences as "media tracker" for PLoS ONE, see Why it is important for media articles to link to scientific papers, the follow-up: Why is some coverage of scientific news in the media very poor?, and related: The Ethics of The Quote.


More like this

I think we're about to get overrun by zombies. Last chance for links. Science: From vibrator sales to troubles with monogamy, evidence aboundsthat Homo sapiens is an exceedingly sexual species.Science historian cracks the 'Plato code'"A state of institutional denialism"A Neuroscientist Uncovers A…
Ever have one of those times when you have a cool new blog post all ready in your head, just needs to be typed in and published? Just to realize that you have already published it months ago? Brains are funny things, playing tricks on us like this. I just had one of such experiences today, then…
Yesterday, we wrote and all discussed PalMD's pet peeve about mass media outlets not using journal citations when reporting new science, health, and medicine stories. A lively comment thread ensued here and there. But, as usual, I am reminded that blogfather, Bora Zivkovic, discussed this issue…
Interactions with the Mass Media (pdf): Our analysis shows that interactions between scientists and journalists are more frequent and smooth than previously thought. This five-country survey also suggests that the scientists most involved in these interactions tend to be scientifically productive,…