Mariah Carey

When I mutter about the fourth culture, about the possibility of bridging the cultural chasms separating art and science, I should make it clear that I'm not talking about stuff like this. In fact, I think there's something mildly offensive about turning one of the more profound equations of modern physics into a lame, self-aggrandizing album title.

More like this

Ben Stein is out and about flogging his upcoming farce of a documentary, Expelled, and he recently repeatedly shot himself in the foot during a recent appearance on Glenn Beck's self-aggrandizing CNN show. If you can stomach it, here's the video; Hearing what Stein said during this brief…
I admire David Brooks for trying to expand the list of topics written about by Times columnists. (To be honest, I'm a little tired of reading about presidential politics.) His latest column, on "The Neural Buddhists," tries to interject modern neuroscience into the current debate over New Atheists…
Believe it or not, this post is related, albeit somewhat tangentially, to my area of expertise, breast cancer. It's also related to one of my great loves in life, namely loud, obnoxious rock and roll. Unfortunately, it involves bad art and an album cover so puzzling that, even when considering the…
SciBarCamp is a gathering of scientists and others, in an effort to create connections across diverse interests, and, wherever possible, annoy the heck out of Larry Moran. Larry was at SciBarCamp and had a run in with a couple of other dozen people, finding himself as the ONLY person in the room…

I looked through the track titles hoping for a 'Travelling on a light beam' or 'Twin Paradox', but alas, it was just standard torch song fare.

By Ashley Moore (not verified) on 14 Apr 2008 #permalink

I wonder what the E stands for. Energy? Ecstatic? Some other two cent buzzword that is equivalent to Mariah Carey times Carey?

Emancipation. I thought the least she could do is stick with E = energy

In fact, I think there's something mildly offensive about turning one of the more profound equations of modern physics into a lame, self-aggrandizing album title.

I hope you are just kidding around. Because if you are serious, then I think your offenso-meter is in need of some major fucking recalibration.

Jeez, you're a grump. He was clearly kidding. besides, mariah carey's music is much more offensive than her album title.

By Jonathan Shaw (not verified) on 14 Apr 2008 #permalink

at the risk of further offending the professor, might i add my name to the list of the offended?

i drive a delivery route on the weekends for extra cash, delivering pharmaceuticals to 16 walmart pharmacies in an 8hr span. each store has a large advertisement for mariah's album posted at the entrance.

if they are still up next weekend, i'm bringing some black duct tape. at least for the "e=mc^2" part. ;)

By coreydbarbarian (not verified) on 14 Apr 2008 #permalink

According to this article, the actual title of the album is E=mc{+2}.

I don't quite understand how that got translated into E=mc^2 for the album cover, though. The article goes on at quite a length why the title is "additive, not exponential."

Whatever.