Which does not explain why there was no change in the suburbs, where
there was just as much publicity.
Frank Crary said:
Presumably, the publicity was about women in Orlando carrying guns, not
women in the suburbs of Orlando carrying them.
It seems likely that a significant number of women from the suburbs
took the gun training program. I don't see why the publicity would
not have mentioned this. Furthermore, the publicity is supposed to
have worked by reminding criminals of their chances of getting shot.
Should we assume that a rapist will not be able to make the connection
that if he could get shot in Orlando city, then he could get shot in
suburban Orlando.
More like this
Monday’s public forum on science standards:
A press release from the Department of Education gives a few more details about the hearing being held Monday in Orlando about the state science standards.
Greg Booth said:
A previous poster claims guns are not affective in stopping rapes.
The evidence suggests otherwise.
[There was a gun training course for Orlando women in 1966]
The results?
Sam A. Kersh writes:
No, it up to you to show that an 88% reduction in rapes, 35%
reduction in commercial robbery and an 84% reduction in
residential burglaries is insignificant. Proof, not an inane
assertion by Lambert as a citation.
tags: captive dolphins, SeaWorld Orlando,