Well, everyone's doing it, so let's have a ScienceBlogs millionth comment party in Sydney. Daniel MacArthur of Genetic Future might be able to come, so there could be two bloggers from SceinceBlogs there. We're looking at some time between 14 and 21 September. If you have any suggestions or preferences for a time or place, leave a comment or drop me an email.
Update: We've decided on Wed 17th from 7pm at the Arthouse Hotel. RSVP here.
More like this
Scienceblogs is heading toward its one-millionth reader comment, and to celebrate bloggers are throwing millionth-comment parties all across the globe. The London edition will be held on Saturday, September 20th at the Calthorpe Arms. Starting from 7:00 PM, readers in the London area can join…
UPDATE: Party date changed to Sept. 28th. Other details remain the same. Let me know if you are interested in joining us!
UPDATE: Here are details of my party, which is scheduled for Sept 14th:
Brunch at Farmicia, 15 S. 3rd St, Philadelphia, PA at 11 a.m.
Visit Penn Museum of Archeology &…
Well, here at ScienceBlogs, we're heading for another milestone. Sometime in the next few weeks, we will have our millionth comment. If the past is any guide, there will be some celebratory swag, and hopefully, mini-meet-ups. We may have a little Michigan gathering of sciblings, readers, and…
The Seed Media Group is offering a big prize to celebrate the millionth comment on the ScienceBlogs network. One lucky reader, selected at random from those who comment over the next few days, will win a four day trip to New York City, which includes four nights in a 4-star hotel and dinner with…
Wherever it goes off it needs to be handy for public transport as I'll be damned if I'll drive there and not get to have a few beers with the ScienceBlogs crowd!
Somewhere within striking distance of Central or Town Hall then? near UTS?
Or how about the Glasgow Arms opposite the Powerhouse? That's sciencey. Ish.
I'm very sceptical about this so-called party. I suppose daring to question the new religion of scienceblogsogenic parties makes me some kind of heretic.
I mean, there have always been parties, well before scienceblogs. Aren't we being just a bit arrogant claiming this party will be scienceblogsogenic?
There was a party in my suburb only last week. It had nothing to do with scienceblogs. It was part of the natural variation in party frequency that's been going on for millennia.
Have you noticed there's this great big hot thing in the sky called the sun, and when it goes down it's party time? There's your causation.
So how can you go around claiming this one on Wednesday will be caused by scienceblogs?
Come on, where's the proof?
The proof is in the drinking. In vino veritas.