Prying Open the Mind's Eye: Meditation Reduces the Attentional Blink

Attention training through meditation can reduce the duration of the "attentional blink" - in which detection of a first rare target causes people to be unaware of a second target presented soon after the first - according to research by Slagter et al from PLoSBiology.

The attention blink effect is "attentional" because it only occurs when subjects actually detect the first target, and therefore reflects some kind of a refractory period for attentional orienting: consider it the duration of the "blink" of the mind's eye. You can try it here.

Slagter et al administered pre- and post-training tests of the attentional blink to a control group of subjects interested in meditation, as well as an experimental group who underwent a 3 month Vapissana meditation retreat. For our purposes here, Vapissa meditation might be considered a type of mindfulness meditation, because it cultivates a "concentrative" focus on breathing, as discussed last week.

Only the experimental group showed post-test increases in their ability to detect the second target, indicating a shortened attentional blink. This did not reflect a general increase in vigilance, as the meditation-related improvement did not occur outside of the time window in which the blink is normally observed (obviously, given a certain interval between the first and second targets, no one will show an attentional blink). Nor did this reflect a pre-test difference between groups in the attentional blink, as confirmed through covariance analyses.

The authors also analyzed scalp electrical potentials evoked by the first of the two sequentially presented targets, with the prediction that the meditation group would allocate attention differently to that first target (as indexed by the p3b response, known to relate to attentional orienting). The meditation group actually showed a lower p3b response to the first target, relative to the control group - indicating that attention was more effectively allocated to the first target. In addition, the extent to which subjects showed this lowering of the p3b predicted their ability to detect the second target.

Thus Vapissana meditation seems to have streamlined one rate-limiting factor of human performance: temporal limitations in attention and orienting to important features in the environment.

However, these results differ significantly from those discussed earlier in the context of meditation. For example, Jha et al's work reports an effect of previous meditation experience; based on that work, we'd expect that the effects of meditation training would be stronger (or at least different) based on the number of hours of previous meditation experience. Second, it seems that detection of the second target would rely on the ventral attentional system, involved in generating the p3 response known to occur in the attentional blink paradigm. It is possible that the Slagter et al results reflect improvement in the ventral system, despite reports that improvements in that system take longer to manifest - perhaps not as long as the 3-month retreat used here.

Also, perhaps as implied by the BPS Research Digest post on this study, meditation might have had its effects by "de-automatizing" or "untraining" the tendency for subjects to allocate so many attentional resources to a rare but briefly presented target. This kind of mechanism would bring these results in line with those reported in the Stroop paradigm, in which the interference from automatic word reading processes can be reduced or eliminated after meditation training.

More like this

Every body remembers that our life is high priced, however people require money for various stuff and not every person gets big sums cash. Therefore to get good business loans and car loan should be a correct solution.

Do you, perhaps, mean "vipassana"?

thanks! fixed.

Hi Chris,

good to read your comments of the latest reseach in meditation. Important to note that the quality of research is difficult to hold. Paul Grossmann from the Basel University has made some good comments on the topic of "measuring mindfulness in psychosomatic and psychological research". You can find it at…


Thanks George. All of the studies I have reported use standard cognitive tests in their outcomes assessment - none of the "inventories" or scales which Grossmann is criticizing. In fact, none of his criticisms apply here, except perhaps the fact that we don't know exactly what mindfulness meditation is - but that is part of what makes this line of research exciting.

I also think it's important to remember that this kind of research, clearly influenced from outside the scientific discipline, will necessarily attract more criticisms from the scientific community independent of its contribution to our understanding of the mind. kuhn et al.

Hello Chris, apart from cognitive tests did they also take physiological readings such as skin conductivity or heart rate variability?

From a peak performance point of view, athletes often use biofeedback for emotional self-regulation, and I wonder the correlation between that and the phenomemon you describe.

Alvaro - they did not take any physiological measurements. However, in this post I describe evidence showing a reduction in reactive stress after meditation.…

I would be very curious to learn more about biofeedback approaches to attention training, but it's not high on my priority list - all of these training posts I'm doing are part of my comps review of paradigms that might be useful in constructing my own training paradigm.