Preemptive Mythbusters post - jumping on a see-saw

Last night was Wednesday, so of course I watched Mythbusters. You never know when a good blogging opportunity will come up. I could talk about the kinetic energy of arrows, but instead let me talk about their episode for next week. I only caught a glimpse of it in the preview. It looks like they are doing something about jumping on a see-saw and launching the other person. It could be this video they are looking at:


EMBED-Extreme Catapulting - Watch more free videos

From my analysis of this video, I found that the likely outcome was a broken board (if it were not fake). Also, if the person went significantly high, he would experience something like 62 g's. In that position, a person could only take 18 g's for less than 0.01 second. Ok - so that one is fake.

Here is another video with similar physics that I think is NOT fake.

My analysis of this video makes it seem possible (real). Here is a diagram from that analysis.

i-276da167d568e8f1bf078df69ebe6671-amazing-blob-jump-launch-video-analysis-dot-physics.jpg

If you are interested, check out the physics in those two links. If this is what the Mythbusters are doing next week - HA! I beat them to it. Well, I didn't reproduce it and they probably will.

More like this

So, here is a video (from break.com - so you know it is likely fake). null - Watch more free videos If for some reason, you can not view this video, here is the plot. Guy wears parachute and brings a portable thing like a see-saw. Guy approaches large crane dropping a large mass repeatedly (I…
I am excited. This Wednesday, the MythBusters are doing the giant water slide jump. Maybe you are new to the internet and you haven't seen this video. Here it is: And since it is as old as the hills, of course I have already analyzed it - actually twice. First, the video is fake - but it is an…
Frank Noschese is a physics teacher and a blogger (and frequent commenter on Dot Physics). And I nominate Frank as the new librarian of videos that can be analyzed for realness or fakeness. Or, as Frank calls them Win-Fail Physics. Note that I sort of changed his theme a little - sorry Frank.…
This is an old video, but still interesting. In this video clip, Kobe Bryant jumps over a pool of snakes. You are probably thinking what I thought when I see that - this doesn't look real. Really, it must be fake. Why would Kobe jump over a pool of snakes? Isn't that dangerous (even if there…

The same sort of leverage can be condensed by dropping a stack of balls. Biggest one at the bottom of the stack (basketball), them progressively smaller (soccer ball, softball, squash ball). The small ball at the top is a lethal projectile shortly after the bottom ball hits. Consider the Republican party configuration in which Oprah is at the bottom and a nascent Palin is at the top. Pull!

Hey

Nice post. I saw the episode and was shocked at the height they got on that dummy! I'll be the first to admit I'm no maths or physics buff, but shouldn't your analysis contain some reference to the mass and speed of the jumper, jump heights etc? I'm thinking of getting a blob and it would be cool to see what sorts of forces are involved with different sized people/jump heights before I propel small asian kids into orbit.

Hey apologies, missed the link!!!!