Pluto. Planet, or not?

Still moving stuff over from my last server. Here is one that keeps coming up.

Surprisingly, I STILL get comments and questions from students and teachers about Pluto. Questions such as:

  • "Why do scientists hate Pluto?"
  • "How did they discover that Pluto was not a planet"
  • "What will happen to our planet songs without Pluto?"
  • "Why does Goofey wear clothes, but Pluto doesn't even though they are BOTH dogs?"

Here is the explanation I like to give. I like to start with the following question:

Suppose you were outside and saw this (image from wikimedia): i-90e3bc5df8eeee107f42460b0ec6da27-leafy.jpg

What would you call it? Some might call it a tree, others might call it a bush. Does the name change what it is? What if scientist came up a classification for determining if something was a bush or a tree. According to wikipedia, there is not complete agreement on the definition of a tree. This is ok, because the name of something isn't really that important.

That is the point, Pluto is like a green leafy plant that some would say is a bush and some would say is a tree. To make things clear, scientist have created the following definition of a planet. A planet is an object that meets the following requirements:

  • Orbits the sun (this is ok for Pluto)
  • Large enough to be spherical (this is also ok for Pluto)
  • The most massive object in its neighborhood of the solar system (this is where Pluto fails).

Pluto fails the last criteria because it is in the area of Neptune (sometimes it is even closer to the Sun than Neptune). Thus, alas, Pluto is not classified as a planet. It shall be called a dwarf planet.

More like this

Guided By Voices | Music | A.V. Club "Dozens of people can say they were members of indie-rock institution Guided By Voices during its 21-year run, but the Dayton, Ohio-based band was chiefly a creative outlet for a music-obsessed former schoolteacher named Robert Pollard. And Pollard was very…
Short answer: Pluto has only two of the three necessary characteristics to be called a planet. Pluto has not cleared its neighborhood, or orbit. But, of course, there are additional details. The simplest reason that Pluto is not a planet is that planet experts say so, and this is their job. But…
So... the ad hoc sub-subcommittee of the standing subcommittee for the Naming of Names has reported out: the Federation of People Who Believe No Really Important Discoveries are Made West of the Mississippi are reeling in defeat, while the Alliance of the Crusade for Consistency is handed a token…
What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. -W. Shakespeare After writing about the 80th Birthday of Pluto becoming a planet, I was asked about Pluto's planetary status, and whether I thought it deserves to be a planet or not. Let me just recap for you, very…

Wait, what? It was all true until the very last sentence :) The problem with Pluto isn't that it crosses Neptune's orbit 1/10 of the time. It's that it's a member of the Kuiper Belt which is full of similarly-sized objects. That's why it doesn't meet criterion #3.

Very interresting! I will lead all my friends! I actually am researching about PLuto. Need alot of information! Next week monday, I need to present my presentation. I have a skit too! Very funny!!! NoW I dont know what to even say, dude...

By Diane Loh (not verified) on 22 Sep 2009 #permalink

Adam is correct, there are a few errors near the end, although it is not merely that Pluto is a member of the Kuiper Belt --- #3 is incorrectly stated. It is not "most massive," it is "cleared the neighborhood," which means it has obtained gravitational & mass dominance in its respective neighborhood.

Pluto is the largest object in the Kuiper Belt (Neptune is not part of the Kuiper Belt), but it constitutes only 0.07% of all the mass in the neighborhood (Kuiper Belt) and is sufficiently influenced by other objects in the Kuiper Belt so as to undermine its qualification for #1 (orbiting the Sun). Still, the ultimate disqualification is #3, in that it does not dominate within it's neighborhood, within the Kuiper Belt.

By Hellstromm (not verified) on 27 Sep 2009 #permalink

Correcting myself, Pluto constitutes only 7% of all the mass in its neighborhood.

By Hellstromm (not verified) on 27 Sep 2009 #permalink

Actually, Pluto's not even the largest known Kuiper Belt object, that honor goes to Eris. And given how little we know of the Kuiper Belt, it's possible that there may a few others larger than Pluto that we haven't found yet.

By Christina (not verified) on 15 Dec 2009 #permalink

That third requirement stating an object must "clear its orbit" to be considered a planet was contrived for the specific purpose of excluding Pluto and should be thrown out. Pluto is still a planet, as are Ceres, Haumea, Makemake, and Eris. Please do not blindly accept the controversial demotion of Pluto, which was done by only four percent of the International Astronomical Union, most of whom are not planetary scientists. Their decision was immediately opposed in a formal petition by hundreds of professional astronomers led by Dr. Alan Stern, Principal Investigator of NASAâs New Horizons mission to Pluto. Stern and like-minded scientists favor a broader planet definition that includes any non-self-luminous spheroidal body in orbit around a star. The spherical part is important because objects become spherical when they attain a state known as hydrostatic equilibrium, meaning they are large enough for their own gravity to pull them into a round shape. This is a characteristic of planets and not of shapeless asteroids and Kuiper Belt Objects. Pluto meets this criterion and is therefore a planet. Using this broader definition gives our solar system 13 planets and counting: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Ceres, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, Haumea, Makemake, and Eris. At the very least, you should note that there is an ongoing debate rather than portraying one side as fact when it is only one interpretation of fact.