The best of the worst is still horrible [correction appended]

I spend some of my time working with citizen groups from contaminated communities. There are a frightful number of them in the United States, as there are everywhere. The stories are frequently heartbreaking and the polluters heartless. So it's good to remind myself that things could be worse. A lot worse. In fact the US is much better off than most other countries in the world, including European countries when it comes to a polluted environment. The main reason government environmental protection regulations. I'm not saying they have done the job they need to do, and under the Bush administration we have been backsliding. So I'm not saying we've done enough. On the contrary, I am saying something quite different. These regulations work and they need to be made stronger. Much stronger. The strongest argument for the importance of effective government enforced environmental protection comes when you see what it would be like if it didn't exist. You can do that by visiting The Blacksmith Institute's list of the Ten World's Worst Polluted Places. Boingboing (hat tip) did number one on the list, Sumgayit, Azerbaijan. The other nine are Linfen, China; Tianying, China; Sukinda, India; Vapi, India; La Oroya, Peru; Dzerzhinsk, Russia; Norilsk, Russia; Chernobyl, Ukraine; Kabwe, Zambia. None are in the US. I'll pick the last one on the list (the best of the worst, Kabwe, Zambia:

Potentially Affected People: 255,000

Type of Pollutants: Lead, cadmium

Source of Pollution: Lead mining and processing

The Problem:

Kabwe, the second largest city in Zambia, is located about 150 kilometres north of the nation's capital, Lusaka, and is one of six towns in the Copperbelt, once Zambia's thriving industrial base. In 1902, rich deposits of lead were discovered there. Mining and smelting commenced soon after and ran almost continuously until 1994 without addressing the potential dangers of lead contamination. The mine and smelter are no longer operating but have left a city poisoned by debilitating concentrations of lead dust in the soil and by metals in the water. In one study, the dispersal in soils of lead, cadmium, copper, and zinc extended over a 20 km radius at levels much higher than those recommended by the World Health Organization.

A small waterway runs from the mine to the center of town and has been used to carry waste from the once active smelter. There are no safeguards or restrictions on use of the waterway and local children use it for bathing. In addition to contaminated water, dry, dusty, lead-laced soils near workers. home are a significant source of contamination for the locals. Most workers and residents are exposed to toxic levels of lead through inhaling dust in these areas.

Health Impacts:

In some neighbourhoods in Kabwe, blood concentrations of 200 µg/dl or more have been recorded in children and records show average blood levels of children range between 50 and 100 µg/dl. On average, children's blood lead levels in Kabwe are 5 to 10 times the permissible EPA maximum and in many cases are close to those regarded as potentially fatal. Children who play in the soil and young men who scavenge the mines for scraps of metal are most susceptible to lead produced by the mine and smelter.

Status of Clean-Up Activity:

After decades of widespread contamination, the clean-up strategy for Kabwe is complex and implementation is in its primary stages. Blacksmith has helped by supporting a local NGO (KERF) to bring information and educational services on lead poisoning into the local communities. Measures include simple, concrete advice to avoid poisoning, such as prohibiting children from playing in the dirt and rinsing dust from plates and food. However some areas of Kabwe require drastic remediation and entire neighbourhoods may need to relocate. (Blacksmith Institute)

Remember, this is the best of the Ten Worst. I looked at the team of Technical Advisors the Blacksmith Institute used for the selection and I know five of them personally. They are excellent scientists who don't minimize the problems we have in the US. All of them know those problems first hand and their seriousness. They know that there remains much to be done to reduce the unnecessary premature disease, disability and death caused when we don't enforce and strengthen our own environmental protections.

But if you want to see what would happen if we didn't have them at all, take a look at the these ten beauty spots. Then get out there to work to make our inadequate protections better. We are way ahead of most places but far from where we need to be.

Clarification: Oh, my. Commenter ray (thanks!) notes an embarrassing oversight on my part. The list of the ten worst is in alphabetical order! This means Zambia isn't necessarily the best of the worst. It is only the last (alphabetically) of the worst. My face is red. Live and learn. In any event, the main point of the post still holds, even if the title doesn't.

More like this

I'm glad to see that the valleys opened up by Anaconda copper in Chile have dropped from the top ten.

It would be interesting if they would do a top ten by country. Want to take a shot at the top spot in the US?

Rocky Flats?

Here's EPA's top picks

By captainlaser (not verified) on 15 Sep 2007 #permalink

captain: I'd put Hanford ahead of Rocky Flats and Libby, MT maybe ahead of both of them, but I haven't given it a lot of thought. The National Priorities List (NPL aka superfund list) is a regulatory designation. One criterion for getting on the list is whether it has an impact on drinking water, so many inner city sites that are pretty bad never make it on to the NPL.

Defense Depot Memphis is like number one or was and is finally falling off the remediation list. We had it all. Lewisite, dioxin, dieldrin, PCB's, stuff with names that literally took a half a line to type up, VOC's, radiation, phosgene, mustard gas.... thats the short list.

Warning to all though... Some places are too contaminated to build on. So whats our lovely environmental answer? Build a park on it and tell kids they shouldnt play there more than once a week. So if you have one in your city, get in there and find out what they really have going

They told us that the Lewisite "should" be inert by now (WWI era stuff). I told them that ANY exposure to that would result in death and was patted on the head (remember I was the chem-bio officer for my unit). and told to go away.... Three days later they took six to the hospital after they handled it in nothing more than jeans and T-shirts. They started swelling up, throats closing off, burned eyes and skin, heart failure, blistering of the throat and eyes. One of them who's dad was in the Army Corps had to have a liver transplant a few months later. Seems it was at least 50% active. How nice and they said it was "inert". Then there are the mustard gas bombs that are still in there and "inert". Did I mention that they now have a bubble over it and there is a school downwind only 100 yards away?

Rule 1-Dont believe a word that they say when it comes from their mouths. It will be a lie or an omission. Question everything.

Rule 2-Developers have a large part to play in these things. They only see land, not the liability, or the long term health effects.

Rule 3-If you see your city preparing to "accept" the property as remediated, make sure that the developers dont have control of your town. If they do and they accept the property and its dirty then you the taxpayer get to pay for whatever happens post of the acceptance.

Rule 4-Push as I and others did for your water company to produce a report of your water quality. Some states have this already. READ UP on heavy metals. Bacteria? Resort to Revere.

By M. Randolph Kruger (not verified) on 15 Sep 2007 #permalink

Not that it matters much, but the list was released in alphabetical order. Zambia was not necessarily the best of the worst.

pick anyone of a handful of towns in Louisiana, particularly the cancer corridor from NO to Baton Rouge. i had the pleasure of working with some wonderful communities there. frightening stuff. petrochemical cities everywhere. White Castle, Donaldsonville, LaPlace, Gonzales, Plaquemines, Geismar... it goes on.

Commenting about the Zambia site, another clean-up activity that could help these people is Phytostabilization, using plants to control the mobility of lead, etc. to help in protecting the people who are not already seriously affected by lead poisoning.