Gabba gabba! One of us! One of us!

Following up on my earlier post on Roger D. Kornberg's Nobel Prize in Chemistry, I want to call your attention to this comment from the esteemed Pinko Punko:

Well, in the press conf. Dr. Kornberg stated he absolutely and first and formost views himself as a chemist, and his training (Ph.D.) was under a world famous chemist. He considers himself a physical scientist whose goal is to understand the mechanism at the molecular level of a protein machine. Now, perhaps this is somewhat simple chemistry as many of the steps boil down to hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions. You will also note in the history of the Chemistry prize, many nucleic acid-transaction relating research programs have been awarded in addition to post-translation modification of proteins, essentially what many would consider biochemistry. He was on many people's shortlist for the Chemistry prize, perhaps just not those [who] consider themselves primarily chemists. Dr. Korberg referred to Chemistry as the "Queen of the Sciences" and the fundamental basis for molecular understanding.

(Bold emphasis added.)

So, since he:

  1. Trained as a chemist,
  2. Uses chemical methods to study the systems he studies, and
  3. Acknowledges chemistry as the Queen of the Sciences,

I, for one, am satisfied that Kornberg is a chemist.

(He didn't need the Nobel Prize in Chemistry on top of those three to convince me, but it's not like I'm going to make him feel awkward for having one.)

More like this

As Bora noted, this year's Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Roger D. Kornberg for a piece of research (the molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription) that strikes lots of folks as being within the bounds of biology rather than chemistry. I can't do an elaborate discourse on this (as I have…
After Monday's announcement of the 2006 Nobel Prize in Medicine or Physiology, followed yesterday by the announcement of the Prize in Physics, the Oscars of the sciences continue today with the awarding of the 2006 Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Roger Kornberg for his work on elucidating the molecular…
My colleague, Coturnix, just raised the question of whether the awarding of this year's Nobel Prize in Chemistry to Roger D. Kornberg of Stanford University is really an award for biology. A surprise to some of us "youngsters," Kornberg was recongized as the sole winner for elucidating the basic…
The Chemistry Nobel Prize was announced this morning, and goes to only one guy (which is somehwat unusual in this age of massively collaborative science): Roger D. Kornberg of Stanford University, "for his studies of the molecular basis of eukaryotic transcription". I am very much not a chemist, so…

After reading about Kornberg on the nobel site, my 7yo (who loooooooooooves chemistry) sighed happily and said "That's what I love about chemistry mom, it touches everything from the stars to the cells."

He'd be there in a heartbeat. You just have to keep the protein coming, be prepared for a lot of whistling and give him a mile and a half run daily ;)

You want the little brother too? He isn't as avid a chemist as his brother but he was very happy to realize that all we really are is electricity and empty space. (His protein and exercise needs are significantly less than big brother)

Can you tell it's been a long day in the homeschool mines?