Publishing Original Research on Blogs -- Revisited

Over a year ago I threatened to perform some original research and publish it on my blog. I got as far as writing an introduction to the project, but I never actually posted any data. I know, I suck.I had hoped to make the project simple enough that people could follow along. The problem was the available data were not in a form that would be accessible for most readers. So, I've held off until now. But the appropriate data have now been deposited in Genbank, so I can continue the series.

Over the next couple of days I'll post the previously published entries, and they will be followed by the subsequent new entries. I'm hoping to walk through this slowly enough that anyone with a computer and an internet connection can mimic what I'm doing. I'll cover retrieving sequence data from Genbank and analyzing those data using various techniques from molecular evolution. It's molecular evolution for the masses.

More like this

The momentum is building to release the sequestered flu sequence data. The prestigious scientific journal Nature today published a strongly worded editorial, excerpts of which you can read Nature senior correspondent Declan Butler's blog: Indonesia has become the hot spot of avian flu, with the…
Dinosaur fossils have been dug out for a couple of centuries now. They have been cleaned up and mounted in museums and described in papers and monographs. The way this is all done has evolved over time - the early techniques were pretty crude compared to what palaeontologists do today. One of the…
After articulating that my most dire need is to get funded, it may seem disjointed to embark on a series of blog posts about teaching, but there you have it, the life of a professor at a place that requires both research and teaching. I still contend that I will get fired from my job much more…
It's time for the annual blog about the annual Nucleic Acids Research (NAR) database issue. This is the 24th database issue for NAR and the seventh blog for @finchtalk. Like most years I have no idea what I'm going to write about until I start reading the new issue. Something always inspires me.…

If this is purely an educational demonstration, then I'm all for it. If it is meant to circumvent peer review, I have to be very strongly opposed. It's one thing if people discuss peer reviewed research on blogs (and even here there are challenges), but presenting new work without subjecting it to peer review is not something I would want to see develop in this medium.

Excellent. This is pre-peer review. One can do it on Nature Precedings. Or use blogs or wikis like Rosie Radfield and Jean-Claude Bradley labs to post daily lab notebooks. Or one can do it in a more organized fashion as you are suggesting you'll be doing. Most journals (including Nature and PLoS) do not consider this to be prepublished, thus, once the work, with a help from your commenters, becomes ready for submission to a peer-reviewed journal, you just go for it.

It's purely educational. It's not pre-peer-review. I don't intend to publish any of this anywhere else.

In that case, there is absolutely no concern stopping you from doing this.

You need to be absolutely certain that you have cleared doing this with your advisor. If I were your advisor, I would forbid it.

Sounds like fun*! I'm quite interested in following along and trying it out for myself.

*Of course, my notion of fun may be somewhat eccentric, as demonstrated by the fact I usually have a science or math text on my bedside stand for light reading.

"Redfield", not "radfield".

I've been slipping in post frequency lately. Today I can post that my cells aren't growing.... (But at least I'm in the lab a bit.)