Robert Redford's new movie Lions for Lambs is struggling at the box office. It's also been getting largely negative reviews. But since I saw Bill O'Reilly and other right-wing outlets bashing it for its supposed anti-American bias, I felt honor-bound to go see it.
I guess there's no accounting for taste. I loved this movie. I thought it was completely riveting throughout, despite having almost nothing in the way of action. The plot, such as it is, involves three loosely connected stories. In one, Republican senator Tom Cruise is trying to persuade skeptical journalist Meryl Streep that a great new military strategy is about to be unveiled in the Middle East, and that this will finally turn the tide.
In another, political science professor Robert Redford is trying to convince a bright but apathetic student to become more interested in public affairs. And finally, two of Redford's former students, now serving in Iraq, run into some difficulties implementing Cruise's strategy.
Most of the negative reviews I have seen haven't gotten past the level of juvenilitiy. It's too wordy! It's too preachy! Ooooh, I hate that Tom Cruise! Let me just say that I found it a relief to watch a movie in which interesting characters say believable things to each other for several minutes at a time. Movies have gotten so frenetic these days that it's rare for a scene to last more than thirty seconds.
Cruise, who is actually a pretty good actor when he is not promoting his favorite religious cult or preaching about the evils of psychiatry, is terrific as the smarmy, fanatical right-wing senator. I could think of a dozen prominent Republicans who would say exactly what Cruise was saying (a testament to a well-written screen-play) and would say it exactly the way Cruise said it (a testament to good acting).
What I really liked was the story involving Redford's character. I think he perfectly captured the frustration some college professors feel towards their work. Professors invariably love their subject, otherwise they would never go through the hassle of getting a PhD and taking their chances in a perilous academic market. Every academic begins with the hopes of doing really important work in their field and inspiring students to do the same.
But as the years go by those hopes tend to fade. Your research becomes increasingly esoteric and ignored. Your students are usually bored and unprepared. You have the self-doubt of wondering whether you're really making the best use of such talents as you have. That was perfectly conveyed in Redford's character, a testament again both to good acting and good writing.
We must also dispense with the idea that this is some sort of screed. Even in this dopey, right-wing country of ours, I don't think we're so far gone that this surprisingly mild and even-handed movie could possibly be considered a screed. Tom Cruise scores some points in his little debate with Meryl Streep, and Redford is hardly frothing at the mouth against the war. His students who enlisted are presented as heroes. In fact, if you came to this movie not knowing anything about the larger cultural context, it is not really until near the end of the film that an unambiguous anti-war message appears. Only demented right-wing demagogues could see this as anti-American.
I saw the film last night. There were only two other people in the theater except for me, which is pretty bad even for a Monday night. That's a pity. It's much a better movie than you've probably heard. Go see it.
A final coda. I happened to catch Dennis Miller on O'Reilly's show discussing what a left-wing freak show Hollywood is. He complained about people like Redford going off about their political views. The only thing he wants from Redford are good movies, he doesn't care what he thinks about politics.
Right. That's Dennis Miller complaining about entertainers mouthing off about politics. Where I come from we call that chutzpah.
- Log in to post comments
I wonder if Dennis feels/felt the same way about "Chuck" Heston, Bruce Willis, Sonny Bono, "Gopher" from the Love Boat, Ahhnold, Clint, Rush, Toby Keith (and pretty much every other Country star), Kurt Schilling, Ted Nugent...etc.
Man. I think we need a stronger word than Chutzpah.
Tom Cruise convinced me he was a good actor in "Rainman". He did a great job in "Collateral" also.
Had thought about seeing this new movie too, but was put off by the reviews. Will have to reconsider now. Agree that talking, if it has some brains behind it, can be interesting.
Jack Kemp, Jim Bunning, Steve Largent, Alice Cooper, Dean Cain...
Don't forget David Zucker, Dennis Hopper, Vincent Gallo, John Malkovich.
The Religious Right.
For all the complaints about "The Gay Agenda", the only ones pushing an agenda and manipulating the government to push it through is them.
Thanks for the review. As you mention, most of the reviews by the mainstream media are lukewarm at best, so it's good to get a different perspective.
I'd seen the previews for this movie, and decided that I didn't need to go see a movie to get my stomach all tied up in knots about how absolutely insane right-wing demogogues are, and how wrong they have been on every count.
Dennis Miller was a much admired comedian until he came out of the far right closet. Since then, his career has plummetted. It may be more correlation than causation, since he was the author of his own destiny by underperforming on his failed talk show. Nevertheless, he has definitely marginalized himself with his political views by shrinking his audience. I wonder how much of that is feeding his bitterness. I shake my head to think that the once clever, ascerbic newscaster on SNL is now a welcomed guest on OReilly. *sighs*
mk wrote:
"Man. I think we need a stronger word than Chutzpah."
Well, "hypocrisy" comes to mind. But considering the usual style and mindset of most prominent right-wingers, even that term is often woefully inadequate.
~David D.G
"Dennis Miller was a much admired comedian until he came out of the far right closet."
Righto! Dennis Miller was one of my idols back when I was trying my hand at stand up comedy. I even liked the first few seasons of his Talk show. The version we see now hardly seems to be the same person.
Oh, and I've yet to see a film in which Tom Cruise was the reason it was bad. Even if the movie was bad (Top Gun, Mission Impossible 2) Tom was at least OK, if not good.
Speaking of Miller's shows. The one on CNBC, he had Eric Alterman on as a guest and it has to be the most embarrassing three minutes of television ever. Miller pretty much crumbles into an emotional mess and begins mumbling incoherent thought after incoherent thought. Alterman just kills. It's ugly to watch. But also kinda fun!
... not to mention these righties (at least according to Celiberal http://www.celiberal.com/theRighties.php ):
However, you will notice both Kathy Griffin & Fleetwood Mac in that list which would be incorrect, so I am suspicious ... nevertheless. Also, you will recognize Tom Cruise on that list (an actor in the liberal film of note). At last, where else will you see a list with Ozzy Osbourne smack-dab next to Pat Boone?
A list of famous heavy metal songs and their cover versions?
touche !
Some of those names are wildly questionable - I have a hard time believing Marilyn Manson and Kathy Griffin are standing lock-step with the GOP.
Didn't Sam Elliott write a play expressly criticising the Republicans on their use of torture fairly recently? And saying that Mick Hucknall is a conservative is plain crap - one of the reasons he called his band Simply Red was that he is, and always has been, a supporter of the British Labour Party.
Sorry, that should have been Sam Shepard, not Sam Elliott.