Book Fight, Round Two

A few weeks ago I took notice of a looming book fight between Richard Dawkins' forthcoming The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution and Jerry Coyne's book Why Evolution is True.

I gave Round One to Dawkins on the grounds of having a better title. Now Round Two goes to ... Coyne!

His book has shown up on Newsweek's list of fifty books to read now. Quite an honor!

What's that you say? Not really a fair fight since Dawkins' book hasn't been published yet? Cry me a river. Timing is everything.

Tags

More like this

Looks like Richard Dawkins has a new book coming out. It's called The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence For Evolution. I can't wait to read it! But wait a sec? Didn't Jerry Coyne just write that book? Yes, I believe he did. It was called Why Evolution is True. No subtitle needed; the title…
Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum have another of their New Atheist bashing essays up, this time in The Los Angeles Times. It is, alas, a dreadful piece of work. P. Z. Myers has already wieghed in here, as has Jerry Coyne here. The actual arguments in the op-ed are standard fare: The New…
There's an interesting discussion going on between Larry Moran and Richard Dawkins. The subject is the title of Dawkins' 1996 book Climbing Mt. Improbable. It started with this post over at Larry's blog. He included Dawkins in his list of good science writers who were nonetheless excluded from…
Having communicated for so long by blog and e-mail, it was a pleasure to finally meet Jerry Coyne in person last night. He was speaking at the University of Maryland. It was not the easiest trip in the world. Driving was out of the question since it would have involved braving the Beltway near…

WEIT is a wonderful book: the evidence for evolution layed out in one concise, easy-to-read book. My two complaints are the frequent (and unnecessary) snide anti-creationist/IDist comments and zero emphasis placed on the generational holocaust required to make evolution work.

I feel that Dawkin's prose style is a long way in front of Coyne's (cf. "Ancestor's Tale", "Blind Watchmaker" &c.) and so I'm looking forward to September 22nd!

--
Martin

Jason,

Not a fight! Our books are very different, as one might expect. And we've been mutually supportive: Richard gave me a cover blurb, and I'm doing the same for him. We're all in the pro-evolution battle together.

Jerry

By Jerry Coyne (not verified) on 30 Jun 2009 #permalink

IMHO Jerry Coyne's "Why Evolution is True" ranks alongside similar books written by his Harvard University mentor Ernst Mayr. It is the best little book I know of that mentions virtually every important bit of evidence in support of evolution (For me the only glaring admission is Coyne's omission of the importance of mass extinctions in reshaping the Earth's biosphere at least five, more likely, as many as eight, times in the past 550-odd million years (The time interval known as the Phanerozoic Eon.).

However, if Dawkins's new book is as extensive as his superb "The Ancestor's Tale", then I think Coyne has some serious competition!

By John Kwok (not verified) on 30 Jun 2009 #permalink

Jerry -

Well you're no fun at all! You'll have a fight if I say you'll have a fight... :)

And I'm very jealous that you've gotten to see Dawkins' book.

Jason -

So has Genie Scott. She was asked by Dawkins's American publisher to contribute a blurb.

By John Kwok (not verified) on 30 Jun 2009 #permalink

We're all in the pro-evolution battle together.

How touching. Let's all join hands and sing Kumbaya.

By Bayesian Bouff… (not verified) on 30 Jun 2009 #permalink

Jerry Coyne | June 30, 2009 9:16 AM:

Not a fight!

I hope this doesn't mean the Dawkins vs Coyne jello wrestling has been canceled?

My gawd, it is 2009!! Why do we even need books explaining the validity of evolution???

Yes, I know I'm being silly and unrealistic about the current collapse of basic science education in the United States. But still...

The value in books like GSE or WEIT is whether the message of scientific and evolutionary reality can be made palatable and sensible to the fence-sitters, the gullible, or the uniformed. Perhaps THAT is the metric on which we should measure the value of such books?

The rest of us hardly need books to convince ourselves of what we already know.