At Science, a Focus on Media Training for Scientists

In a letter published at Science, Cornell University professors and media relations staff offer their recommendations on media training training for scientists.

The recommendations are based on a media relations course for graduate students taught as part of the Biogeochemistry and Environmental Biocomplexity program.

Below are some specifics:

Currently, most communication training for scientists begins after a prominent scientific discovery, and the training often occurs in a trial-by-fire style. However, a cultural shift is under way, reflecting the higher stakes of research, and an increased recognition by scientists, stakeholders, and policymakers that (i) scientists need to get their message out, (ii) scientists need training to learn how to do so, and (iii) training should begin at the graduate level.

Over the past year, we developed and recently completed a science communication course for graduate students in the Biogeochemistry and Environmental Biocomplexity program at Cornell University (funded by a NSF Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship grant). The goal of this course was to improve our ability to discuss our research with both the general public and the professionals writing and reporting on science in the media. This was achieved through a combination of guest lectures, field trips, and development of individual projects.

From this experience, we strongly encourage other graduate programs to implement science communication training. We have three key pieces of advice based on our effort that we hope will help others in their course development:

First, involve people from multiple fields across your college or university. In particular, we highly recommend involving staff from the press relations office. These specialists have a unique perspective on what topics are newsworthy and on the challenges scientists face in communicating effectively. Include scientists who have personal experience communicating their research to the public and journalists from your campus or local newspaper.

Second, visit a news room (radio, print, or television) and talk to reporters--not just science reporters, but reporters in all fields. Ask to sit in on a meeting where reporters and editors pitch stories to each other. This process reveals what stories interest reporters and how those stories are developed. Understanding this process will help scientists identify and explain the newsworthy attributes of their own research.

Third, get hands-on experience communicating science as part of the class. Do not just set up a series of lectures and field trips: write press releases, write articles, conduct interviews, get interviewed, create a Web page, and set up a science blog. Ask your collaborating journalists and PR specialists to facilitate and critique student projects. Hands-on experience with feedback from media professionals and other students provided some of the most useful learning experiences in our course.

More like this

A bit over a month ago, "framing" was the hot argument in these parts (see here, here, and here, and links therein), with zillions of comments about how difficult it was to understand what Mooney and Nisbet were advocating. Today, Matt Nisbet appears to endorse a suggestion made in a letter to…
Kate Seip of The Anterior Commissure and two of her colleagues have announced the formation of Science Communication Consortium: There's been a good deal of recent discussion, both face-to-face amongst colleagues and friends and within the blogosphere itself, on how scientists can effectively…
Next week, I will be teaming up with Chris Mooney at Cal Tech for an evening lecture followed by a day long science communication seminar for the university's graduate students and post-docs. Details are below along with the suggested reading list. Speaking Science Boot Camp Matthew C. Nisbet…
With the final countdown underway and the conference less than a week away, this post follows my post on library people in attendance at Science Online 2012 from a few weeks ago. And I'd like to start off with another best-tweet-ever, this time Marieclaire Shanahan retweeting Colin Schutze: + they…

Many of the bits of advice they offer are a part of the Media Fellowship Scheme that has been running in the UK for 20 years or so. Check out the BA Media Fellowships

It was an idea that I lifted from the AAAS and that the British Association adapted to meet the needs of working scientists rather than would-be science writers.

The problem is that this scheme can handle only a handful of scientists every year. With researchers far outnumbering writers, it is hard to see how everyone can get real hands on experience.

I have participated in workshops. Some seem to do a reasonable job in communicating the issues facing science writers.

First, though, scientists have to respect the role of the science writer. I recently encountered one eminent researcher who seems to have the opinion that science writers are failed researchers. This it not my experience. Many science writers I know are, unlike me, brighter than a lot of the researchers I have encountered. They just have different interests.

communicating knowledge is what i perceive a natural gift.NOT many scientists could be coerced to adopt the role of a sci communicator and only those who have the flair and predisposition can only do the job better.
Dr.Arvind Mishra

Varanasi
India