Think Progress, the blog for the Center for American Progress, has a detailed run down on the Obama administration's announced appointment of Steve Chu as Energy secretary, Carol Browner as the head of the new National Energy Council, and Lisa Jackson as head of the EPA. At Dot Earth, Andrew Revkin has more background on Chu.
The plan is for this new policy team to be working with Congress and the states to pass bold new initiatives on energy and climate change, but it is not necessarily a given that strong public support for these policies will follow along.
These policies--along with recommended changes in consumer behavior and action--need to be communicated in a way that reach important audience segments and that resonate with the background of these audiences. In short, no matter how innovative, smart, progressive, and "science-based" the policy, public support will only follow if the policies are carefully communicated.
That's why we need a national Office of Energy and Climate Change Communication, a coordinating center that funds audience research on energy and climate, designs and implements national scale public communication campaigns, and that coordinates message strategy across agencies and non-governmental organizations. Along the model of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, this office should also invest in nonprofit news initiatives on climate change, an important step for building up the national and local infrastructure needed for climate adaptation.
On this idea, my colleague Edward Maibach and co-author Karen Akerlof recently reviewed three possible models for such an office based on campaigns in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Canada (PDF, page 4). As they recommend, any national campaign to shape individual and collective behavior in the US should be based on three broad categories: carrots, also known as incentives, sticks as regulations, and sermons, in this case communication campaigns.
As they note, and as I have often "sermonized" at this blog, effective communication about energy and climate change will only come with research that segments audiences and that tests and implements messages tailored to the background of that audience.
- Log in to post comments
We need Suggestion Boxes that can be accessed by the average person on the street, where new ideas actually make it to our leaders in Government. There is no dependable way to get good ideas to our government from the ground up as it is. When I write my Congressmen with ideas, if they ever do write back, it is always obvious that they have no clue of how things work away from Washington and in the real world. For instance, the company at this website: www.cyclonepower.com, could clean up our environment in less than 10 years and at the same time nearly wipe out our dependence on foreign oil. Do yopu think we can get anyone in government to listen? Hell no! If you know of a way for the average American to get heard please let me know. Thanks E.A.
Steve Chu was also one of the plenary speakers at the recent launch event for the Science and Entertainment Exchange--a new program from the National Academy of Sciences that connects scientists with entertainment professionals.
A good sign that he understands the importance of "sermoninzing".