More like this
Wilkins has replied to my post on species concepts.
The gist: there are a bunch of species concepts, many of which are pretty darn good.
My reply: that's awesome as long as they guide future research. The BSC provides a framework for studying reproductive isolation. Ecological species concepts are…
Because I haven't riled up Wilkins in a while.
I was chatting with a friend who has published a fairly high profile article on speciation about species concepts. We came to the conclusion that species concepts are useless unless they guide future research. Okay, we were just echoing Coyne 'n Orr.…
John Wilikins has a post on my last couple of entries:
In a couple of posts, Scibling Alex Palazzo of The Daily Transcript has given two quite distinct views of what biology is about: information, and mechanism. In the first he argues that what is needed to build organisms is information, and in…
A little while back I published an article on species concepts in Reports of the National Center for Science Education, and I just discovered that it is available on the web. This is actually abetter format than the published version, which has weird columns and layout. The citation is
Wilkins,…
My favorite part:
"has been said to me, that one ought not know too much about a topic if you are to define it clearly. This is because the expert knows all the many nuances that apply in different conditions, and writes not to the beginner but to the other experts. So I must note here that my thesis and continuing work is on species concepts,"
Translation: Look at me, I am so damn smart, in fact, so smart that you probably won't understand any of this...
I saw that movie. It was pretty awful.
BFD: Come on, he's got a good point. It would be nice if scientific concepts were all simple enough that they could be summarized neatly in a short passage, but frankly the realities of science are complicated. That's why we have specialists now, and it's hard to find a real "renaissance man" (not that people aren't knowledgeable across many fields, but rarely *expert* in many divergent fields).
We want a nice, easy definition of species that fits into one line and can be summed up in a paragraph or two in the usual introductory-level university or pop-science book. But the nitty gritty is the real fun, interesting stuff. Just nice to have a heads up sometimes that one is about to get into the nitty gritty. I think that's all Wilkins was going for.
What'd you think of his post itself?