I note that Slate is congratulating a reader who guessed the top 3 finishers for both Repubs and Dems. Well, I got everything right except flipping Biden and Richardson (heard some guy on the radio say he was going for Biden, so I did it for the hell of it!). OK, this is a bit easier I think...but here I go....
Republicans:
McCain
Romney
Huckabee
Paul
Giuliani
Thompson
Hunter
Keyes
Democrats:
Obama
Clinton
Edwards
Richardson
Kucinich
Gravell
Most of these are "gimmes" now and I've followed "conventional wisdom" (e.g., Obama up, Clinton down), with the main exception being that I think Paul will over-perform and pass the deflating Giuliani. Percentages to come.... (after I do a little more reading)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The primary happens tomorrow, and I'm ready with my predictions (see my Iowa outcome).
Republicans:
McCain - 33%
Romney - 30%
Huckabee - 14%
Paul - 12%
Giuliani - 7%
Thompson - 3%
Hunter - 1%
Keyes - 0%
Democrats:
Obama - 45%
Clinton - 30%
Edwards - 19%
Richardson - 4%
Kucinich - 2%
Gravel - 0%…
Again, based on knowing almost jack-shit about politics compared to the pundits, here are the percentages I'm predicting after reading websites for a few hours....
Republican:
Huckabee - 29%
Romney - 27%
Thompson - 15%
McCain - 13%
Paul - 10%
Giuliani - 5%
Hunter - 2%
Keyes - 1%
Democrat:
Obama-…
Now that I have joined the call for ScienceDebate 2008, what do I think...
NB: these are my personal opinions and representative of nothing more profound than the WVU vs OU game being rather uninteresting... ;-P
US politics are bistable - the two-party system is a design feature that is hard to…
I don't really know much about politics...but that never stops people from blogging about politics, so here are my Iowa predictions ranked ordered from first to last.
Republican:
Huckabee
Romney
Thompson
Mccain
Paul
Giuliani
Hunter
Keyes
Democrat:
Obama
Edwards
Clinton
Biden
Richardson
Dodd…
If you're right again, I'll be a believer!
This is very impressive. But where are the lovely cats?
Actually, a win in Iowa isn't always a good indicator for how a candidate will do in other primaries. For example, Bill Clinton lost Iowa in 1992; George H. W. Bush lost it in '88; and Reagan in '80.
As for New Hampshire, I would actually place Paul above Huckabee ain that primary because the N.H. electorate seems to be far more sympathetic to Paul's views than the evangelical protectionism espoused by Huckabuck.
Actually, a win in Iowa isn't always a good indicator for how a candidate will do in other primaries. For example, Bill Clinton lost Iowa in 1992; George H. W. Bush lost it in '88; and Reagan in '80.
as other's have pointed out, your N is small. IOW, the indicator isn't statistically significant either way.
Keyes?
Are you sure you don't mean Tancredo?
yes. keyes joined the race. tancredo has dropped out.