New Hampshire predictions

I note that Slate is congratulating a reader who guessed the top 3 finishers for both Repubs and Dems. Well, I got everything right except flipping Biden and Richardson (heard some guy on the radio say he was going for Biden, so I did it for the hell of it!). OK, this is a bit easier I think...but here I go....

Republicans:
McCain
Romney
Huckabee
Paul
Giuliani
Thompson
Hunter
Keyes

Democrats:
Obama
Clinton
Edwards
Richardson
Kucinich
Gravell

Most of these are "gimmes" now and I've followed "conventional wisdom" (e.g., Obama up, Clinton down), with the main exception being that I think Paul will over-perform and pass the deflating Giuliani. Percentages to come.... (after I do a little more reading)

Tags

More like this

The primary happens tomorrow, and I'm ready with my predictions (see my Iowa outcome). Republicans: McCain - 33% Romney - 30% Huckabee - 14% Paul - 12% Giuliani - 7% Thompson - 3% Hunter - 1% Keyes - 0% Democrats: Obama - 45% Clinton - 30% Edwards - 19% Richardson - 4% Kucinich - 2% Gravel - 0%…
Again, based on knowing almost jack-shit about politics compared to the pundits, here are the percentages I'm predicting after reading websites for a few hours.... Republican: Huckabee - 29% Romney - 27% Thompson - 15% McCain - 13% Paul - 10% Giuliani - 5% Hunter - 2% Keyes - 1% Democrat: Obama-…
Now that I have joined the call for ScienceDebate 2008, what do I think... NB: these are my personal opinions and representative of nothing more profound than the WVU vs OU game being rather uninteresting... ;-P US politics are bistable - the two-party system is a design feature that is hard to…
I don't really know much about politics...but that never stops people from blogging about politics, so here are my Iowa predictions ranked ordered from first to last. Republican: Huckabee Romney Thompson Mccain Paul Giuliani Hunter Keyes Democrat: Obama Edwards Clinton Biden Richardson Dodd…

If you're right again, I'll be a believer!

This is very impressive. But where are the lovely cats?

Actually, a win in Iowa isn't always a good indicator for how a candidate will do in other primaries. For example, Bill Clinton lost Iowa in 1992; George H. W. Bush lost it in '88; and Reagan in '80.

As for New Hampshire, I would actually place Paul above Huckabee ain that primary because the N.H. electorate seems to be far more sympathetic to Paul's views than the evangelical protectionism espoused by Huckabuck.

Actually, a win in Iowa isn't always a good indicator for how a candidate will do in other primaries. For example, Bill Clinton lost Iowa in 1992; George H. W. Bush lost it in '88; and Reagan in '80.

as other's have pointed out, your N is small. IOW, the indicator isn't statistically significant either way.

Keyes?

Are you sure you don't mean Tancredo?