Age & income: South Carolina exit polls

Was checking out the exit poll data. Two things that jumped out at me....

Here are the votes for Obama from non-blacks in the South Carolina primary by age:
18-29 - 52%
30-44 - 25%
45-59 - 23%
60+ - 15%

Here are the votes by income for Edwards:
Under $15,000 - 14%
$15,000-$30,000 - 15%
$30,000-$50,000 - 16%
$50,000-$75,000 - 22%
$75,000-$100,000 - 26%
$100,000-$150,000 - 24%
$150,000-$200,000 - not enough data
$200,000 or more - 29%

Update: Andrew Sullivan says:

Then this: Obama won every demographic among the religiously observant. And the more devout they are - judging by their church attendance - the better he did. His narrowest margins against Clinton and Edwards were among those who never attend church services.

In New Hampshire and Nevada we have data which suggests Obama is stronger among the more secular (no data from Iowa that I can see). But I think the most plausible explanation is that what you're seeing in South Carolina is the impact of the black vote; blacks are more religious than whites. Just as younger whites (there aren't many Latino or Asian American voters in South Carolina from what I can tell from the exit polls) were more favorable toward Obama than older whites, I would be willing to bet that wealthier and more educated whites would also lean in his direction compared to poorer and less educated whites. Whatever you might say about it, but Obama does have a diverse coalition, and not just in terms of race. (though to be fair, one can say that about the Democratic party as a whole of late, with a coalition of racial and ethnic minorities, the remaining white working class vote as well as social issue driven professionals).


More like this

I suggested below that though on average whites did not move toward the Democrats, regionally there might be differences. I inferred this from the fact that areas where blacks are thin on the ground in the South it looks as if John McCain did better than George W. Bush in 2004. So I compared the…
The map to the left shows the counties which voted for Obama (blue) and McCain (red) in the 2008 election. The blue counties are part of the Black Belt, the area where blacks are a majority of the population because of the economic concentration of cotton culture during the 19th and 20th centuries…
In regards to the title, in a word, I don't think so. More on that later. Nationally the exit polls suggest that these are results for Barack Obama broken down by "Size of Place": Urban: 63%Suburban: 50%Rural: 45% There's a rather clear relationship here whereby Obama's vote totals in urban areas…
You can say whatever you think, or believe, or want to think or believe, about the importance of Clinton's whiteness, Obama's blackness. and Edward's southern whiteness. As the primaries move south of the Mason Dixon line, race has become the only issue of importance. Why do I say this? Because…

"votes for non-blacks"? Define? Is that votes for anyone but Obama?

Oh, you mean voted for Obama by non-blacks by age. Totally different.

"Under $15,000 - 14%", etc.

Is that the percent of all of Edwards votes, or a percent of all voters in this income group voting for Edwards?

Thanks - I should have done the math and added up the numbers - the answer would have been obvious ;-)

I have heard people voted for him just to vote against Clinton. News from other countries said it wa obviously a race vote in SC.