Tag Clouds for my Papers

Brian posted tag clouds for two of his recent papers. Having no shame, Lab Lemming followed suit. Since I have even less shame, I'm just going to jump on while the bandwagon is rolling.

So here's the tag cloud for Davies et al., 2008, currently in review with EPSL:

created at TagCrowd.com

That's not too bad. It passes the suckup test at least - none of the authors, or the authors' PhD advisors, were referenced often enough to appear in the list. However, it fails the squabbling faction test - our archrival colleague Adriano Mazzini, who's done lots of work on the same system and come to different conclusions, makes the tag list. I'd have to go back and count to see how many of the references are places where we build on his work and the work of his collaborators, and how many are places where we disagree with their conclusions. We were careful not to issue any mentitas. Note also the inconsistent use of "Fig." and "Figure" - oops.

Now let's try Brumm et al. 2008, currently in review with the Journal of Marine and Petroleum Geology:

created at TagCrowd.com

Brutally fails the suckup test, the self-citation test, the squabble test, and the heavily cites a recent review instead of the original papers test! It's a good thing I have less than no shame. (Note to reviewers: These citations are all perfectly appropriate.)

Okay, last but not least: Brumm et al. in prep, which I will submit just as soon as I have stopped being distracted by the various things on my to-do list that actually have hard deadlines attached:

created at TagCrowd.com

The number of tags my final paper shares with the first two might explain why I haven't finished writing up my thesis yet. I'm stuck on the part where I have to describe how "et al.", "significant", and "km" constitute the unifying themes of a single, coherent intellectual endeavor.


More like this

It's been two years* since the ground opened near Sidoarjo, Indonesia, spewing mud over the homes, farms, and businesses of tens of thousands of people. The disaster quickly acquired the rather endearing name of "Lusi", which is short for "lumpur" (Indonesian for mud) and "Sidoarjo". The two-year…
Schulte has published a reply to Oreskes' response. While Schulte claims not to be a contrarian, Kevin Grandia has been looking at his links with Christopher Monckton. Meanwhile, John Lynch posts on Shulte's reply and commenter "Chris" (who is, I suspect, Christopher Monckton) threatens lawsuits…
A quick note for those of you interested in mud volcanoes (and I know there are many of you). From an article titled "Earthquake Triggering of Mud Volcanoes" by Magna et al we learn that ... Mud volcanoes sometimes erupt within days after nearby earthquakes. The number of such nearly coincident…
Recently, a paper published in a Chinese journal of science by Monckton, Soon and Legates attracted a small amount of attention by claiming that climate science models "run hot" and therefore overrepresent the level of global warming caused by human greenhouse gas pollution. The way they…

PhysioProf ... if you mean what's the purpose of doing it for scientific papers like we've done, then I guess, for me, it's to simply get a very quick visualization of what a paper is about. Simple as that.

I think what's kinda cool is when you compare the text clouds from the different authors ... you can really see what specific research they are interested in (or, at least, what they are working on).

So, I guess it depends on what you mean by "purpose". We are simply communicating what we write about to each other. The text cloud allows someone to digest the main topic/discipline/theme with a 10-second glance.

LL: Yes. Also "Madre".

PP: Purpose?! It's a tag cloud! How dare you question Web 2.0!

Maria - I'm passing this Six Word Meme thing on to you (I got it from Dinochick); details at LFD (that's Looking For Detachment not some **f** sort of thing!).