Myungwan Kim was beaten by the MoGo computer system by 1.5 points in a nine stone game.
"It played really well," said Kim, who estimated MoGo's current strength at "two or maybe three dan," though he noted that the program - which used 800 processors, at 4.7 Ghz, 15 Teraflops on borrowed supercomputers - "made some 5-dan moves,"
Read the horrific details here.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
The World Open went well. I managed six points out of a possible nine. Sadly, you needed six and a half to win any money. Did manage to pick up a handful of rating points, however. My final tally was four wins, three draws, one loss, and one half-point bye, which I will explain in a moment.…
I had two big deadlines this Friday for various projects, and I am happy to report that I made both of them. That means I finally have time to take a breath, and write the post you have all been waiting for. What happened at the U. S. Amateur Team East chess tournament!?
That's right! Over…
Hello. I'm still here. Let me get you caught up on some things.
In graduate school I was required to take a battery of four qualifying exams before I could be “advanced to candidacy.” These exams were conducted orally, meaning you had to stand in a room with two faculty members and answer…
Magnus Carlsen of Norway has won the big chess match against the defending champion Viswanathan Anand of India. This result was not surprising, though some were probably expecting Anand to put up more of a fight than he did. Only ten of the scheduled twelve games were played, with Carlsen winning…
Well, okay, yeah. Throw enough computer cycles at any game, it'll crack. But based on the known limitation of Moore's Law, is this sort of power ever likely to trickle down to consumer level, or will such a system always remain a pathological case available only to research labs?
(Not so worried about the 4.7 GHz processors themselves -- those will probably be commonplace by 2010.)
Now I can no longer tell my friends that computers have been unable to play at Dan strength. Sigh.
Although... the computer was given a huge advantage, with 9 stones. Has a computer ever beaten a Dan-rated player without the handicap?
@Duae
AFAIK no, a computer has never beaten a professional player without a handicap.
Though I would wager that no computer would ever be able to defeat Hikaru. :D
Does this mean you have to have some serious stones to take on a computer these days...?
It's not necessarily that simple. Go isn't really much like chess - it's much less susceptible to brute force calculation.
There's always much rending of garments and gnashing of teeth when a computer becomes significantly better at some game, but it seems to me that the reason these games are interesting to us is that they require unnatural computational abilities, the kind of skills that very few people possess and that are very difficult to teach. It shouldn't be surprising that computers can beat people at them, any more so than a cheetah outsprinting the fastest human or a chimpanzee outlifting the strongest human. It shouldn't take away from the accomplishment of people who are good at them. What's really surprising to me is that it's taken so long to come up with programs that are good at them, but that just speaks even more to the ability and accomplishment of people that are good at them.
Has Conway quantified "some 5-dan moves" ?