Teabaggers Explained

In their own words ...

They call themselves Teabaggers, but really, they are nothing other than Republicans. Out of the box, run of the mill, nothing special Republicans.

You might think that these conversations are cherry picked, a rare set of unusual views held by a small number of the people at this rally.

I spent hours on the telephone last election speaking to randomly chosen voters in a high-SES Republican district in Minnesota. A minority of people with whom I spoke were pretty serious Democrats supporting the Democratic slate. The rest of the people with whom I spoke with Republicans.

Every single one of the Republicans sounded pretty much like the people on this video, more or less. Generally, more.

The local candidate I was calling for was not white. That was a major concern of many of the Republicans. They were also concerned about his position on gun control. I would often hear this:

"What is his position on gun control."

And my answer would be, "I'm not sure. But since he's a career Marine he's probably a pretty good shot."

More like this

Donald Trump is the president elect of the United States. Why? Trump did not win because he is widely liked. He is NOT widely liked. A very small number of Americans voted for Trump, and this number was magnified by the conservative-state-favoring electoral college, and most of those who did not…
Erik Paulsen is my representative to the US Congress. This is his first term. He replaced a very centrist Republican (Jim Ramstad) who retired honorably. I worked for the Democratic Party (DFL, we call it in Minnesota) candidate, Ash Madia during that election. Ash was a good candidate but he…
Erik Paulsen is my representative to the US Congress. This is his first term. He replaced a very centrist Republican (Jim Ramstad) who retired honorably. I worked for the Democratic Party (DFL, we call it in Minnesota) candidate, Ash Madia during that election. Ash was a good candidate but he…
By "Controlling the Message" I mean setting the agenda, usually by putting something out there that causes other people to shift their own message to be more like yours. I can think of a few spectacular yet small scale examples that are safe to talk about. I'll give you one, although if certain…

Damn. I didn't get very far into that before I couldn't stand to watch any more.

Sometimes I think there are two separate species of humans.

"Sometimes I think there are two separate species of humans."

Agreed. I similarly cannot listen to Democratic moonbats. And you know what? It's good that this country is a federation. You guys can have New Jersey and Oregon, we can have Nebraska and Texas, and everyone is (reasonably) happy. Diversity, my friend!

By Vast Right Win… (not verified) on 24 Apr 2010 #permalink

I really really hope that Victoria Jackson is trying to pull off an Andy Kaufmann (sp?) type of hoax!

And my answer would be, "I'm not sure. But since he's a career Marine he's probably a pretty good shot."

That's actually a very good answer to that question. How they take it, who knows?

By MyOwnGrandfather (not verified) on 24 Apr 2010 #permalink

As usual, the uneducated who have been brainwashed with Fascist slogans do not even understand the issues. The spew nonsense heard from talking nut cases from Fox news. There was about 10% of facts in what these ugly Republican teabaggers said.

By NewEnglandBob (not verified) on 25 Apr 2010 #permalink

Unsurprisingly, Teabaggers are as bad at explaining themselves as they are at explaining anything else - in fact I think their inability to clearly identify and articulate the root of their sense of disenfranchisement is one of the major sources of their anger. Their claim not to be racists, for example, seems to hinge, for many of them, on a subtle (and artificial) distinction between being uncomfortable with a black president and being uncomfortable with the social change that allowed a black man to be elected president - if they could just formulate that in a way that sounds halfway plausible, they'd be considerably less embarrassed with themselves.

Vast Right Wing Conspiracy @ #3:

You guys can have New Jersey and Oregon, we can have Nebraska and Texas, and everyone is (reasonably) happy.

Listen, I'm all for getting rid of flyover country, but only if it's done in a way that actually, physically removes it (think "artificially created subduction zone"). After all, just giving it sovereignty wouldn't actually reduces flight times between the coasts.

/sarc

By Phillip IV (not verified) on 25 Apr 2010 #permalink

Phillip IV, for a moment there I thought you were talking about making a great inland sea (or, more correctly, expanding our existing great inlands sea) which would give us more coast.

CPP, Awesome "fuck" factor. Dude, 20% of your words contained it somewhere! Your talent is humbling.