I was thinking something like "Imma let you finish being stupid and all, but first I want to review the preponderance of evidence for evolution. But you may also like to see Genie Scott's take on it:
- Log in to post comments
More like this
A life science teacher should not have to know about creationism to teach evolution, other than to the extent that you may cover the history of evolutionary biology, and begin in the days before science took center stage and natural philosophy was dragged off with one of those big vaudeville hooks…
Originally published by Greg Laden
On February 6, 2009 11:14 PM
It's out! Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction (Second Edition) is now available on line and in bookstores (or at least it is being shipped out as we speak).
This is the newly revamped edition of Genie Scott's essential…
It's out! Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction Second Edition is now available on line and in bookstores (or at least it is being shipped out as we speak).
This is the newly revamped edition of Genie Scott's essential reference supporting the Evolutionist Perspective in the so called "…
A timely repost:
It's out! Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction Second Edition is now available on line and in bookstores (or at least it is being shipped out as we speak).
This is the newly revamped edition of Genie Scott's essential reference supporting the Evolutionist Perspective in…
How's 'bout this?
http://lifeofg.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/darwin-150x150.jpg
Disingenuous - putting words in dead Darwin's mouth. I wonder why people do this - is it an implicit appeal to authority? "I don't have any credentials, but if Master So-and-so were alive, he'd say ..."
"Imma let you finish being stupid and all"
Do you really think Charles Darwin would have said that? if not, why did you word it like that?