That's me!
The article opens by acknowledging that 66 percent of Americans believe creationism is definitely or probably true from a recent poll. Yet the article turns to biological anthropologist Greg Laden for how to squelch the opposing viewpoint to evolutionism.
And so on and so forth.
That's on the Answers in Genesis web site as part of their newsletter.
More like this
Even though Michael Ruse is an evolutionary philosopher, he also is a self-described deist, so I probably should have been ready to be disappointed.
Suppose for a minute that everything the creationists say about evolution were true. Now suppose you had lost your mind... but I repeat myself. What would the history of that ersatz and terrible "science" be?
Following on from parts one and two, here is the penultimate portion of the talk.
The latest attempt to create sparks over science and religion came on Sunday in the New York Times book review.
Keep up the good work. Where do they get this notion that the content of science classes should be determined by popular vote?
Nice going! Now that you have your (rehabilitated leg and) foot in the door there, figure out how to bring the house down on top of them.
The best part is this: They think that I've miss stepped because I'm saying that bringing "the controversy" into a classroom for open discussion is a disciplinary problem. But really, all I was saying is .... that bringing "the controversy" into a classroom for open discussion is a disciplinary problem!
Sounds like you've got a new nickname: Squelcher!