This is the warmest November yet, in terms of "surface temperatures."

Surface temperatures are only one way to measure global warming, but it is a sort of standard and it is meaningful because surface temperatures have a lot to so with weather and such. Data for NASA's GLOBAL Land-Ocean Temperature Index in 0.01 degrees Celsius using a base period of 1951-1980 can be found HERE. Climate Communicator ThingsBreak put a graph on the internet based on those data for November. Here's a copy of it:

HottestNovemberOnRecord_2013

Earth’s surface temperature in °C for each November since 1880 (compared to base period, 1951-1980). Stefan Rahmstorf, creator of the graphic, used the SSAtrend smoother described in Moore, J. C., et al., 2005. New Tools for Analyzing Time Series Relationships and Trends. Eos. 86, 226,232. The filter half-width is 15 years. The results are similar to using LOESS or LOWESS. The raw data are, of course, in blue.

More like this

Every month NASA GISS comes out with the new data for the prior month's global surface temperature, and I generally grab that data set and make a graph or two. In a way this is a futile effort because the actual global surface temperature month by month is not as important as the long term trend.…
"I'm not a natural leader. I'm too intellectual; I'm too abstract; I think too much." -Newt Gingrich When an issue comes up, and it can be decided based on facts -- on data, on evidence, on things you can measure and quantify -- is it ever okay to decide that issue based on your feelings rather…
The Register, an occasionally accurate online IT newspaper, has been running a series of warming denial pieces, by one Steven Goddard. Goddard has been trying to cast on temperature and ice data. Unfortunately, he does a whole lot of cherry picking. For example: A second important issue with NASA'…
This is just a weather prediction, so it is subject to revision, but the National Weather Service is expecting an historic heatwave in the American West next week, probably peaking next weekend. Temperatures in Death Valley will approach 130 degrees F, and Las Vegas will top 115 degrees F, if…

Greg, if I'm reading this right it is even more dramatic. This is the "anomaly" not the temperature, which means the deviation from the mean is growing, not just the actual temperature. Right?

By Peter Gleick (not verified) on 14 Dec 2013 #permalink

Both. That is an absolute anomaly, not a measure of variance, so it is the same as the temperature in C but where zero isn't at 0 C. Also, since the baseline is post start of global warming, the below zero part isn't cool.

I can't believe you just said that below zero isn't cool. I live away down south, and below zero is UNTHINKABLY cool.

By CherryBombSim (not verified) on 15 Dec 2013 #permalink

A few things that I have noticed over the past year or so.. (note: I live in the UK)

- Since June, we have had relatively 'normal'weather. For example, we actually got a summer this year.
- In contrast to the past few years, it's been mild. This morning it was 13 degrees (C).
- Further afield, the Arctic has has a less-catastrophic-then-usual melt season.

My wild guess (Hypothesis would be too grand a word) from this is that we could be returning to a pre-2006 state where we see a return to el-Nino conditions, with warming concentrated further south, a recovery/slower decline in Arctic sea ice.. and some serious new surface temperature records.

Obviously I could be completely wrong..

By Andrew Dodds (not verified) on 15 Dec 2013 #permalink

The arctic had a melt-down as worse as any of the post-arcti-is-melting-down era. The year before was EXCEPTIONAL AMONG THE EXCEPTIONAL. This does not give other years in which the Arctic sea ice melts exceptionally a pass! There is no evidence whatsoever of an Arctic recovery, unfortunately. That is entirely a meme made up by climate science denialists.

There is however a reasonable chance of an El Nino this year though.