Will Neil DeGrasse Tyson's Cosmos be a turning point in science denialism?

Neil DeGrasse Tyson on CNN:

And while we are on the topic, Carl Sagan, of the original Cosmos, on climate change:

See also this from Chris Mooney at Mother Jones.

And just for the heck of it, here's my interview with Neil deGrasse Tyson from 2011.

More like this

I'm sure that a lot of you, like me, are watching the rebooted version of Cosmos: A Spacetime Odyssey, with Neil deGrasse Tyson taking over the hosting duties originally handled so ably over 30 years ago by Carl Sagan. I definitely enjoyed the first episode and am looking forward to additional…
--Director of the famous Hayden Planetarium at the Museum of Natural History, New York City -- Hosted the science TV show "NOVA scienceNOW" on PBS --Named to host new sequel to Carl Sagan's "Cosmos" TV series on Fox later in 2013 In addition to his research, astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson is…
If you missed the first (or later any) episode of Cosmos 2014, you can get it on Amazon Prime streaming (for a fee). It's worth it. Here are a few comments I jotted down (then lightly edited) while watching the first episode. Neil does have his own spaceship, like Carl did. That's important…
Forget about framing for a second. What about the messengers? Speaking to the BBC's World Service, Jim Hansen bemoans the dearth of good science communicators. Given the context of the interview, I think he's referring specifically to climate science communicators. The entire interview is online,…

Tyson is brilliant and has exactly the right touch for this.

I have your radio show bookmarked for listening when I have 45 minutes for it. Atheist radio on Sunday mornings, eh? That's an achievement. Though, it would not be surprising if the religious right seizes on that and uses it to attack Tyson.

Tyson making reference to cellphones was spot-on. At some point we have to start demanding that science denialists put their money & muscles where their mouths are, and give up technology. The GPS in cellphones makes use of Einsteinian relativity, and CD/DVD players make use of QM. if these dorks can't even accept thermodynamics, they have no right to make use of Einstein and QM.

There is something about Tyson I don't like... I think it is his "I am more intelligent than you" attitude.

Reminds me a bit of a famous video of Richard Dawkins taking a question from an audience member which was something like "Can't you concede that there's a *tiny* chance that Science might be wrong?" And he went ballistic. He said when you use Science, airplanes fly, rockets go to the moon, computers compute, etc. "It just *works*, B!tches!"

To Markm,
I would be very surprised if what you think is attitude is doesn't reflect reality as far as you're concerned.
Did he say that for that reason he is better than you?
When and what was your last great contribution to life on earth?
Would you also resent the fact that he also might be taller than you?

By J P Garon (not verified) on 12 Mar 2014 #permalink