Top candidates only, non-partisan polls only, likely voters only, graphic updated October 15th, most recent polls October 12.
More like this
Trump went into the GOP debate last night with a roughly 20% poll standing. Everyone will tell you to ignore polls early in this race, they never predict the outcome of a primary or a general election. That, however, is a non sequitur.
Here is a nice article about Elizabeth Edwards and her new book and here is a nice interview with her.
Earlier, I reported a poll indicating that "one third of British Teachers" support teaching creationism in the classroom. I thought this was vaguely interesting, which is why I mentioned it briefly on this blog, but I put the idea of pursuing this off for a later time.
Boyda poll shows dead heat with Ryun:
During a news conference, Boyda, of Topeka, said her underdog campaign remains a dead heat.
Apropos of this topic (vis-à-vis U.S. presidential election predictability), there's an interesting view expressed in this Wednesday (10/14) blog from Reuter's:
http://blogs.reuters.com/great-debate/2015/10/14/forget-what-you-saw-la…
Not sure "top" candidates is quite the right word given their quality. Then again "leading" or "highest" and least of all "best" hardly fit either.
Still reckon it'll be Jeb! Bush vs Hilary Clinton for the 2016 US elections but not as sure of that as I once was. Just such an unimpressive, crazy mob to choose from Repubs wise.