Can You Hear the Sound of Elephant Feet Dragging?

There are so many misbehaviors, such as the Foley sex scandal and "PlameGate" (need I say more?), that deserve attention and action by the Rethuglicans, yet these issues fester while BushCo signs the terror bill into law.

Bush's plan becomes law just six weeks [italics mine] after he acknowledged that the CIA had been secretly interrogating suspected terrorists overseas and pressed Congress to quickly give authority to try them in military commissions.

If I was a rethuglican, I'd be very angry with the discrepancy between the attention that the administration focuses onto the terror bill, ignoring other equally important events that will undermind the trust that the public has in the rethuglican party.

But fortunately, this bill tries to protect detainees from the worst abuses that they could suffer at the hands of their captors, although it does not go far enough in my opinion;

The bill ready for signing would protect detainees from blatant abuses during questioning - such as rape, torture and "cruel and inhuman" treatment - but does not require that any of them be granted legal counsel [italics mine]. Also, it specifically bars detainees from filing habeas corpus petitions challenging their detentions [italics mine] in federal courts.

Basically, the republicans are excited about restricting the basic freedoms of Americans (see italics in the above cited paragraph), but they are still dragging their feet with regards to the application of this bill's anti-torture demands;

White House press secretary Tony Snow said that after Bush signs the legislation Tuesday, the government will immediately begin moving toward the goal of prosecuting some of the high-value suspects being held at the U.S. detention centre at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. He expected it would take a month or two to get "things moving toward a trial phase."

"Trail phase"? What ever happened to "just say no" to abusing detainees?

Cited story.

Tags

More like this

This week, many things have been happening up north. The most important being ... from the NY Times, Canadian Court Limits Detention in Terror Cases : Canada's highest court on Friday unanimously struck down a law that allows the Canadian government to detain foreign-born terrorism suspects…
It's going to be one of those weeks, so I don't know how much I'm going to get to post. I do, however, want to share the editorial from this week's Nation (emphasis mine): George W. Bush's decision to move Khalid Shaikh Mohammed and thirteen other "high value" Al Qaeda captives from secret CIA…
What can you say?   Arch Gen Psychiatry is one of those non-open-access journals that publishes one free-access article in each issue.  Usually the free article is not particularly interesting; they do not seem to make use of the open-access articles routinely to make material of general public…
One of the most fascinating aspects of the Hamdan case was that it was argued not by a prominent legal scholar or law professor, nor by a private defense attorney, but by a military lawyer from the JAG office, Lt. Cmdr. Charles Swift. Think about the position this put him in as an officer, taking a…

Typos. Grrr. They hurt my eyes.

By Peggy Murray (not verified) on 17 Oct 2006 #permalink

It seems clear in this bill that the President has final say on methods of interrogation, Without habeas corpus, the prisoner has no way to fight charges, no evidence has to be presented, If considered secret info. Anyone can be designated an enemy combatant by the President under this legislation! That means Aunt Hattie in Portland could be put away without any legal claim! This bill is dangerous and a whitewash for the criminals in the Whitehouse.

By judy roth (not verified) on 17 Oct 2006 #permalink