Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945

tags: , , , , , , , ,

OMG, this is the most hilarious scientific research video parody I've seen. It is a fly-on-the-wall view of what happens when a research paper is sent out for peer-review and the mysterious reviewer #3 demands more experiments before the paper is accepted for publication. Unfortunately, it is closer to the truth than the public (and even some scientists) realizes ...

"Or I could write it up for Scientific American."

Hahahaha!

More like this

tags: researchblogging.org, female scientists, science publishing, double-blind review, single-blind review, cultural observation, gender bias, sexism, feminism A microbiologist at work. Image: East Bay AWIS. A few months ago, a controversy occurred in the blogosphere regarding whether…
tags: cultural observations, email, pets, humor, funny, fucking hilarious, streaming video This short video gives you a fly-on-the-wall view of why email was invented: pets!
There's an article in yesterday's New York Times about doubts the public is having about the goodness of scientific publications as they learn more about what the peer-review system does, and does not, involve. It's worth a read, if only to illuminate what non-scientists seem to have assumed went…
You often hear scientists and philosophers of science talk about the peer-review process as if it's some epistemological magic trick, as if it automatically sifts through the mass of submitted articles and finds The Truth. Of course, if you've ever been through the peer-review process you know that…

I don't know about other fields, but in my field the "open access" journals had some of the top scientists as editors and reviewers who, in their own words, were sick of the slow process leading to the publication of mediocre articles in the printed journals.

I refuse to write anything up for "Scientific American"; I think they had gone downhill very quickly around the time Martin Gardner stopped contributing.

By MadScientist (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink