Scientific Peer Review, ca. 1945

tags: , , , , , , , ,

OMG, this is the most hilarious scientific research video parody I've seen. It is a fly-on-the-wall view of what happens when a research paper is sent out for peer-review and the mysterious reviewer #3 demands more experiments before the paper is accepted for publication. Unfortunately, it is closer to the truth than the public (and even some scientists) realizes ...

"Or I could write it up for Scientific American."

Hahahaha!

More like this

tags: cultural observations, email, pets, humor, funny, fucking hilarious, streaming video This short video gives you a fly-on-the-wall view of why email was invented: pets!
tags: researchblogging.org, Female Scientists, science publishing, science blogging, gender bias, sexism, feminism A microbiologist at work. Image: East Bay AWIS. In the wake of the Science Blogging Conference in North Carolina, which I was unable to attend due to financial reasons, The…
One of the greatest shocks when I started working in industry was the realization that the peer-reviewed paper, the most valuable form of currency in the academic world, was valued so little. In academics, there is a well-established reward system for getting your work published in peer-reviewed…
tags: researchblogging.org, female scientists, science publishing, double-blind review, single-blind review, cultural observation, gender bias, sexism, feminism A microbiologist at work. Image: East Bay AWIS. A few months ago, a controversy occurred in the blogosphere regarding whether…

I don't know about other fields, but in my field the "open access" journals had some of the top scientists as editors and reviewers who, in their own words, were sick of the slow process leading to the publication of mediocre articles in the printed journals.

I refuse to write anything up for "Scientific American"; I think they had gone downhill very quickly around the time Martin Gardner stopped contributing.

By MadScientist (not verified) on 20 Jan 2010 #permalink