1. sheril
  2. Hurricanes, Population, and Damage

Hurricanes, Population, and Damage

By cmooney on July 27, 2006.

I've just noted that over in the comments at Prometheus, Roger Pielke Jr. has taunted myself and numerous others for not blogging about the recently released statement by a number of hurricane experts, on both sides of the hurricane-climate divide, saying that whether storms are intensifying or not, we had better stop our "lemming-like march to the sea." I applaud the statement, although I am not at all surprised by it. It seems to me that U.S. hurricane experts have agreed upon this basic and undeniable fact--that we have foolishly put far too many lives and far too much property in harm's way--for quite a long time. The hurricane-climate debate has received so much attention from journalists, I conjecture, in part because it seems sharper and newer (although it actually has a long history) and in part because it potentially complicates this narrative.

That said, the real reason I didn't blog about this very important statement is simple: I'm overseas at the moment and was just feeling lazy.

Tags
Global Warming and Hurricanes

More like this

Hurricanes less interesting than expected
RP Jr criticises me for not posting about hurricanes whilst on holiday in the peak district. Sorry - the wireless connections on Stanage Edge are poor, and I didn't take my laptop anyway. RP likes the story because the main result We are optimistic that continued research will eventually resolve…
The dim and distant history of climate blogging
There's a thread on twitter, started by "@JacquelynGill" noting "The Day After Tomorrow", "@ClimateOfGavin" replying that "it was that movie and lame sci community response that prompted me to start blogging", and continuing "Spring 2004 was pre-RC, Scienceblogs, etc. Deltoid was around, Stoat, @…
Bjørn Lomborg WSJ Op Ed Is Stunningly Wrong
Bjørn Lomborg wrote an opinion piece that is offensively wrong Bjørn Lomborg is the director of the conservative Copenhagen Consensus Center. He is author of two books that seem to recommend inaction in the face of climate change, Cool It, which appears to be both a book and a movie, and “The…
RP Jr to world: come on if you think you're hard enough
There's a fair section of the - errm - normally-sane-side-of-the-climate-wars blogosphere that regards RP Jr as the spawn of the devil. Eli weighs in complaining about Nate Silver of 538 getting RP to write for him (Eli has form, dontchaknow). Now I'd be the first to agree that RP has said some…

Any observations on what's happening at NASA with respect to earth monitoring from space? The "trashing the rental just before moving out" approach to earth?

=====
NASA's Goals Delete Mention of Home Planet

July 22, 2006 Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company
By ANDREW C. REVKIN

From 2002 until this year, NASA's mission statement, prominently
featured in its budget and planning documents, read: "To understand and
protect our home planet; to explore the universe and search for life; to
inspire the next generation of explorers ... as only NASA can."

In early February, the statement was quietly altered, with the phrase
"to understand and protect our home planet" deleted. In this year's
budget and planning documents, the agency's mission is "to pioneer the
future in space exploration, scientific discovery and aeronautics
research."
=====

Does anyone really think that some "science policy expert" somewhere is going to convince people to change their building habits significantly?

If they do, they may be interested in some prime oceanfront property in Arizona.

The only thing that would change people's building habits is if insurance company's quit footing the bill for reconstruction after storms, which, in the aftermath of Katrina, may actually be on not too distant horizon.