My new Seed column, with the same title as this post, is now online. It's about how to convey the "perfect moral storm" that is the global warming problem to an American public that remains deeply confused and even ambivalent about the issue....as epitomized by NASA administrator Michael Griffith's recent bonehead statement to the effect that global warming isn't a problem. Is he trying to massively over-correct for James Hansen or something?
Prometheus has more.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Chris Mooney's latest Seed column is now available free at the magazine's web site. Chris spotlights several panels at this year's AAAS meetings that focused on how to better engage the public on complex science issues. Several panelists at AAAS echoed our Framing Science recommendations,…
Eli Rabbett coined the usage "to Rasool", to refer to the practice of attributing papers to just one of the authors in order to target the only author mentioned:
A very famous paper by S. Ichtiaque Rasool and Steven Schneider in the early 70s modeled the effects of aerosols on global temperature.…
The reaction from the scientific community to NASA Administrator Michael Griffin's lack of concern over climate change is blunt. Here are some examples. First, from Jim Hansen, who works for Griffin: "I almost fell off my chair. It's remarkably uninformed."
Next we have Berrien Moore, director,…
House Science Committee chair Sherry Boehlert--who has countered attacks on science before--isn't going to stand for the current games at NASA that are being played to restrict scientists from speaking. In a letter to NASA administrator Michael Griffin, Boehlert writes the following:
It ought to go…
Griffin's statement is boneheaded, but it is basically Bush's position, so it is boneheaded not just because it is stupid, but because of who thought of it (which means it is stupid by definition).
Above all, Griffin works for Bush and he has undoubtedly gotten a lot of flak about Hansen. I'd bet that there is more than a little of the "I'll show Hansen who is boss" going on here -- childish, to be sure.
I once was a state climatologist (SD), I heard all of these complaints from my peers (engineers, physical scientists, agriculture scientists) all the time. I never had that problem , I think it was because I treated journalists with respect and invested my time up front to formulate a statement(s) that could be quoted or used in a TV clip. It really helps if the intended audiences believes they could have said what they hear from the person who is saying it. Most of my peers would object by saying it was too complicated to put in those terms. My response was, "you have not thought carefully enough about your knowledge if you cannot express it in the imagery of the common person on the street." It is still true.