Happy Sputnik Anniversary


[Words heard round the world on October 4, 1957: "Beep. Beep."]

Fifty years ago today, the Soviet launch of Sputnik changed the United States forever--propelling science to the center of policymaking and launching a tradition of well-informed governance that, unfortunately, has since been in a woeful decline.

Luckily at least one presidential candidate wants to do something about it: Hillary Clinton, who will be giving a speech today on science policymaking at the Carnegie Institution. According to the AP she plans to unveil the following proposals:

_ Expand human and robotic space exploration and speed development of vehicles to would replace the space shuttle.

_ Launch a space-based climate change initiative to combat global warming.

_ Create a $50-billion strategic energy fund to research ways to boost energy efficiency and reduce reliance on fossil fuels.

_ Comply with a legal requirement that the executive branch issue a national assessment on climate change every four years. She would also expand the assessment to reflect how U.S. regions and economic sectors are responding to the challenges posed by climate change.

_ Name an assistant to the president for science and technology, a position that was eliminated in the Bush White House.

_ Re-establish the Office of Technology Assessment.

Cool, huh? Unfortunately I'll miss Hillary's speech--Mooney and Nisbet are off to Seattle for this talk. But if you want to get a sense of just how bad the science policy gap is that Hillary hopes to fix, check out this Al Jazeera segment, featuring yours truly, on Bush's gambling of the planet...


More like this

I guess we should be glad that Senator Clinton has a plan to end the Republican War on Science. It needs to be done and she is right to do this, but it's sort of like getting excited that someone boldly supports the notion that 2 + 2 = 4. Clinton announced yesterday that: Hillary will restore the…
As a blogger, I usually willfully delineate a giant chasm of non-communication between myself and political issues, preferring to dabble in the absolute: time, space, theoretical technological infrastructures, and, recently, aliens. I wrote one very reticent entry in 2005 about chimeric research,…
On the fifty year anniversary of Sputnik yesterday, the Center for American Progress launched "Science Progress," a new web and print publication dedicated to science policy. The editor in chief is Jonathan Moreno, a Senior Fellow at CAP and the David and Lyn Silfen University Professor and…
Hillary Clinton gave a science policy speech at the Carnegie Institute Now with new improved policy list... Text is here Doesn't say if she took questions. Predictable kick offs on stem cells and climate change. Wonkish, very solid. Restore science advisor, OTA, depoliticize agencies and advisory…

Al Jezeera? I guess you don't mind helping anyone that hates Bush even if they hate America too.

Just after 9/11/2001, I reviewed a book called Sputnik: The Shock of the Century by Paul Dickson.

The book has been reissued to take advantage of this anniversary. Click my name for my impressions of it.

Hillary has picked up Chris' terminology:

The pledge, which she laid out under a banner that read Reclaiming Our Commitment to Science & Innovation, was part of an agenda Clinton laid out to end what she called the Bush administration's "war on science."[emphasis added]

Way to go, Chris!

If Hillary Clinton truly supports expanding the space program, reestablishing the Office of Technology Assessment and meaningfully addressing our nation's contribution to climate change, well--that raises my opinion of her quite a bit.

And, I suspect, many other voters' opinions too.

It would be outstanding if this election were actually fought on the issues (science and space funding, healthcare, foreign policy, intelligent taxation).

By Ms. Krieger (not verified) on 04 Oct 2007 #permalink