Our Fearless Leader

i-57d13aad46b9f294f2e70b86d110952d-Chapman.jpgOver at Shifting Baselines, Randy Olson just posted an interview with Matthew Chapman, the original guy behind the curtain of Science Debate 2008. Sheril and I have taken to calling Matthew our "fearless leader," but "fearless, selfless, deeply inspirational leader without whom this wouldn't have been possible" is better, I think.

Here's a quote from the interview, in which Matthew talks about how it all began:

I spoke about the debate idea to a few people who were more or less entirely cynical. I then spoke to Chris Mooney. Chris was interested, and brought his Intersection co-blogger, Sheril Kirshenbaum, on board and they immediately began to stir up the blogosphere as it had rarely been stirred up before, and also recruited scientists and science related people. Another friend of mine, Austin Dacey, created the website and provided organizational help. Then physicist and writer Lawrence Krauss joined us. Lawrence was unbelievably effective in recruiting top people from both science and business. He got 6 Nobel laureates to sign on in a single day! At about the same time, I was introduced over the phone to fellow screenwriter, Shawn Lawrence Otto, (House of Sand And Fog) by a producer who had a project both of us wanted to write. We went from being competitors to collaborators. Shawn, who has managed political campaigns, brought the final ingredient that holds the whole thing together. He is a far better manager than I am, he's diplomatic, politically wise, hard working, and fearless.

As with all endeavors there is a great deal of luck involved. All I did was say "Yes" to whoever wanted to help, and luck delivered a core group, the founders of this, each of whom brings something unique and essential. Chris is proactive and impatient to make progress. Sheril is proactive and optimistic and encourages everyone. Austin is philosophical. Lawrence is our energetic link to the upper levels of academia and science. Shawn is as described above.

There is more about the origins of ScienceDebate2008 in my latest Seed column, but that isn't online yet.

Oh, and did I mention that Matthew Chapman is the great-great grandson of Charles Darwin?

So go read the interview!

More like this

I spend a lot of time complaining about the ineptitude of the science world when it comes to mass communication and function in mainstream society. But all of a sudden here is this Science Debate 2008 effort that is being run with shockingly good style and savvy. Who in the world is behind such a…
So this is the first bit of news that we've been promising.... In the latest issue of Science, we--the ScienceDebate2008 crew--have a policy forum article that lays out how this all got started, its implications, and where it's going. Doing the article was Sheril's idea, and she did a great deal of…
originally published December 10, 2007 by Chris C. Mooney So, finally, Sheril and I can tell you what we've been working on. Let's begin with some background: Nearly a month ago, I linked up with Matthew Chapman, the author, screenwriter, and great grandson of Charles Darwin. Chapman, I already…
About a year ago, we had an idea to make science more prominent on the campaign trail this election cycle: ScienceDebate2008 was born. It wasn't long before a lot of folks took notice and the initiative grew rapidly. Eventually, the presidential candidates weighed in. This week,…

To echo Chris and Randy, Matthew is so much more than our 'fearless leader'... he's an absolutely inspiring individual. To say I've become a great admirer of this man over past months would be an understatement. He's warm, funny, charismatic, and absolutely brilliant (although extremely humble). Matthew motivates all of us every day.

Yeah Matthew!

I'm so glad that excellent communicators took this up--apparently the rest of us haven't been so good at that from the bench these last few years....

I'm also glad that scientists have recognized this great idea and were so supportive online and at AAAS. 'Twas lovely to behold.

Matthew is apparently afraid of unbiased debate forums, though.

This debate is a sham. They have created an arbitrary cut-off for "viability" in order to avoid inviting Ron Paul to the debate. Ron Paul is a medical doctor - aka a scientist - and he was not invited to this debate.