The Candidates Have a Moral Obligation...

...to attend ScienceDebate2008. Watch here to see why:

Get the Flash Player to see this video.

This text will be replaced

For more info from our latest press conference, see here.

More like this

Here's the word, from Sheril at The Intersection - and the word is exciting! For months everyone has been asking us, when will there be an invitation sent to candidates...a date... a venue... Well it's finally happened! It's official. Hillary Clinton, Mike Huckabee, John McCain, and Barack Obama…
So...Sheril and I had a long day yesterday at the N.C. Science Blogging Conference, the highlight of which--at least for us, given how much we practiced for it--was our panel (with Jennifer) on the framing and communication of science. There have been a lot of reactions to the panel...for a…
If we can get the world of science to speak with one voice on the matter, it will become harder and harder for politicians to resist the call for a presidential science debate. Today, that moves much closer to reality with the official news that the American Association for the Advancement of…
Lots going on just one day into February... In Science magazine, Donald Kennedy has an excellent editorial called 'The Real Debate': We in the United States are sliding down a ramp that will take us, in just 4 days, to the much anticipated "Super Tuesday" in the presidential nomination cycle, when…

I hate to rain on your parade, but don't expect a single candidate to accept. The government sold out to the multinationals in the 60s, and it will keep getting worse and worse. Think of the US as a huge rich corporation and the multinationals as corporate raiders. They are taking over on the cheap, selling off the assets, and will leave this country one huge bankrupt without resources, only a crushing debt.

By Rose Colored Glasses (not verified) on 16 Mar 2008 #permalink

So the "multinationals" - many of which happen to be US owned and based companies - have no interest in maintaining a robust science ability in the US? They aren't the least bit interested in scientific developments we might, oh I don't know, patent and sell for profir to the rest of the world? Seriously, how many of our modern technological devices came from US goverment research? The smoek detector in your home, for one. So a scientific debate can be a good thing, especially in our technology driven age.