That's the title of my latest Science Progress column....even though the column itself is not entirely about sheep. Rather, it's a recounting of the Mooney-Nisbet science communication "boot camp" at Caltech....but, well, sheep came up, and believe it or not, it was in a pretty profound way.
Insofar as that's possible.
For more, read the column.
P.S.: Did anyone else notice Sheril subbing for me at Science Progress last week and writing a pretty profound column on the plight of postdocs? Even if you did notice, you may not know that this is her first piece of freelance science writing, and a very successful one at that...which calls for some applause, no?
- Log in to post comments
More like this
I've tried a different tack now — I've left several comments on Matt Nisbet's very own blog, in the fading hope that he'll actually pay attention to what I'm saying, rather than what he imagines I'm saying, or what other people tell him that they imagine I'm saying. Comments there are held up for…
"When a star goes supernova, the explosion emits enough light to overshadow an entire solar system, even a galaxy. Such explosions can set off the creation of new stars. In its own way, it was not unlike being born." -Todd Nelson
Did you follow all the action this past week over at the main Starts…
Chris Mooney and Sheril Kirshenbaum were right about one thing.
They sent me a copy of their new book, Unscientific America: How Scientific Illiteracy Threatens Our Future(amzn/b&n/abe/pwll), with a strange request: "We hope that like Dr. Coyne, you will suspend judgment until reading the book…
Jonathan Katz's "Don't Become a Scientist" has bubbled to the surface again, turning up at P.P. Cook's Tangent Space a few days ago. I can't recall what, if anything, I said about this that last time it came around, but I'll make a few comments here, in light of the recent discussions about jobs in…
Chris,
I found a good new reference case for you and Matthew, as if you needed more. This one is from Stephen Smoliar at The Rehearsal Studio and it his comments on Academics and the Media.
We're sheep? Could be. Will the workshop go on the road?
Sheril's postdoc piece hit home. I'm in year 5 of my postdoc after a 6 yr PhD. She did great on the article and I hope to see more lengthy contributions from her in the future. You both have a lot behind what you say in more ways than a blog does justice.
Thus the problem with pure tech schools (MIT/CalTech/RPI), the students, future scientists (and to some extent the engineers), have limited to no interaction with the rest of the world, the "liberal arts majors" as scientists/engineers like to sneer. So they end up being surrounded by people with a basic minimum level of science understanding and never interact on an intellectual level with said "libarts" folks. Start mingling the two groups and they'll realize that there are a whole slew of people that have little to no interest in their deep scientific pursuits and while not totally lacking in that basic understanding, don't put the same 2+2 together and need a little more help in that area. Journalists just happen to be the ones they have to teach the most so that the Journalist can further make the connections for the rest of the populace.
At least that's what I learned after knowing many people from the above schools (having gone to one), and people of the liberal arts world (having dated many, lived with a good number, and growing up in a richly mixed world of the two). My "libarts" friends are all fascinated by the stuff, but not able to cleanly make the connections we take for granted. Step them through how their prior knowledge links to these new discoveries, etc. and they gain a much greater respect for what they learned and what new research is being done.
It's the non-gender version of Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus...
Conversely, scientists with little to no humanities education can come off to "libarts folks" as astoundingly naive when it comes to evaluating ideas which cannot be analyzed using scientific methodologies.