Bad news at NASA

By hrynyshyn on July 22, 2006.

From today's New York Times comes a story that should worry everyone:

From 2002 until this year, NASA's mission statement, prominently featured in its budget and planning documents, read: "To understand and protect our home planet; to explore the universe and search for life; to inspire the next generation of explorers ... as only NASA can."

In early February, the statement was quietly altered, with the phrase "to understand and protect our home planet" deleted. In this year's budget and planning documents, the agency's mission is "to pioneer the future in space exploration, scientific discovery and aeronautics research."

Continued below the fold.

E. Steitz, a spokesman for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, said the aim was to square the statement with President Bush's goal of pursuing human spaceflight to the Moon and Mars.

But the change comes as an unwelcome surprise to many NASA scientists, who say the "understand and protect" phrase was not merely window dressing but actively influenced the shaping and execution of research priorities. Without it, these scientists say, there will be far less incentive to pursue projects to improve understanding of terrestrial problems like climate change caused by greenhouse gas emissions.

This makes me angry. Very, very angry, indeed.

Tags
Climate

More like this

To Understand and Protect our Home Planet
This is upsetting. NASA has deleted from its mission statement the phrase "to understand and protect our home planet." This edit was made in conjunction with the Bush administration's new Vision for Space Exploration, whose primary objective is to shift NASA's emphasis (and public attention) away…
Political Science
As a blogger, I usually willfully delineate a giant chasm of non-communication between myself and political issues, preferring to dabble in the absolute: time, space, theoretical technological infrastructures, and, recently, aliens. I wrote one very reticent entry in 2005 about chimeric research,…
NASA - science and sensibility
The below-the-fold note was seen on WIRED. It's a plea to prevent political interference from continuing to demolish the scientifically worthwhile aspects of the NASA program, in favour of the bread and circuses smell to the lunar base. A friend worked in the Astrobiology Program NASA funded, which…
Defunding the evidence-gatherers
According to a report by the National Academies of science Cutbacks Impede Climate Studies: The government's ability to understand and predict hurricanes, drought and climate changes of all kinds is in danger because of deep cuts facing many Earth satellite programs and major delays in launching…

"In early February, the statement was quietly altered..."

Any idea who ordered or approved this change?

By Hamsterbaffle (not verified) on 22 Jul 2006 #permalink

Your link is not an "a href=" I think you accidentally made it a "mailto."

On the article? Pathetic. Nasa should be spending more time studying the Earth rather than unrealistic Mars expeditions. It seems like yet another global warming deflection by the Bush adminstration.

to pioneer the future

Can I just say: wtf??? How exactly does one "pioneer the future"? If they've invented a way of getting to the future faster than everyone else, I'm sure we'd all be interested in hearing it.

Get a goddamn proofreader.