Narrowly escaping humiliation

Over at The World's Fair, David asks readers to share a moment in which they were "humiliated in the name of science." Fortunately I haven't had any "D'oh! I put the head on the wrong end!" moments as yet, but I'll briefly share a recent story of how I almost humiliated myself in a room full of professors and friends.

About a month and a half ago Brian Richmond came to present a lecture about the evolution of hominid bipedalism at Rutgers, specifically dealing with Orrorin. As he went through the introductory material, mentioning the evidence for bipedalism in the earliest known hominids, I thought to myself "How could he have missed the paper about Orrorin that was published in Science just last month?" I sat there, holding onto the question until the end, when eventually Richmond started talking about that particular study. Not only did he know about it, he was one of the authors of it.

I'm sure that my face turned red slightly at that point; I have only taken a more intense interest in paleoanthropology in the past year and I don't always remember the names of authors. I told Richmond about my foiled attempt to look smart after the lecture and he seemed to think it was a little amusing, admitting that he tried to build up suspense a little bit by not mentioning the new research until a few minutes in. Fortunately nothing bad came of the experience, but it has made me pay closer attention to authorship since then.

More like this

I have to admit I felt a bit foolish this evening. I went to see a lecture by Brian Richmond about hominid bipedalism, although the name didn't register with me. So I'm sitting there in front, watching him talk about Orrorin and how there haven't been any good studies about it, all the while…
The ape human split is a bit of a moving target. In the 1970s and early 1980s, there were geneticists who placed it at very recent (close to 4 million years ago) and palaeoanthropologists, using fossils, who placed it at much earlier. During the 1980s, the ape-human split moved back in time…
The origin of bipedalism, one of the classic traits popularly cited to separate humans from other primates, has long been a controversial area of research. A number of hypotheses have been floated over the years, but now that more fossil material from the time around the chimpanzee/human split has…
Even though I still have less than 100 pages left to go, I thought I would share a few thoughts about Ann Gibbons' recent book The First Human (specifically since Pierce asked for my thoughts on it). I do have a few criticisms, but outside of a few minor points of contention the book is highly…

One of the authors? Dude, he was first author. Almost an epic faux pas there! :)

This is one of the reasons I could never have gone the career direction you're taking - I would be doing things like that every day. And I'm always amazed that there are people who never ever make mistakes like that.

deang,

After awhile it starts to come naturally, almost like you wouldn't forget the names of your friends, or of famous people. When you read several dozen papers from a well established scientist, and you continually use their methods or observations to conduct your own experiments, you start referring to them, and it sometimes sounds as if you have some well-grounded relationship with them (you never know who you'll run into at a meeting as well)!