Elephants out of the ooze

By the 1920's the evolution of elephants (proboscideans) seemed all but resolved. Paleontologists had long been familiar with mammoths and mastodons, the great shaggy beasts that had so recently gone extinct, but in 1901 fitting candidates for the progenitors of all later elephants became known. Named Moeritherium and Palaeomastodon by British paleontologist C.W. Andrews, the two proboscideans from Eocene rock of the Fayum region of Egypt were the forms that could connect elephants to the rest of the mammal family tree.

Finally elephant evolution could be presented in a straight line. It had started with the short and stout Moeritherium, a snub-nosed elephant that lived like a hippo. (Some, like H.F. Osborn, thought that it was not an elephant but a collateral relative. He regarded it as a "missing link" that only stood close to the true ancestry of elephants, but other paleontologists generally regarded it as the first proboscidean.) Palaeomastodon represented the next, more terrestrial step. As H.F. Osborn remarked in a popular description the entire skeleton of Palaeomastodon seemed "prophetic" of the multitude of elephant types that were to come.

Much like the earliest tetrapods, elephants were thought to have crawled out of the swamp. It was this transition to land, and the opening of migratory routes through Asia and into North America, that transformed them into more familiar forms. This was represented by an illustration in a 1907 Century magazine article about the wonderous fossils of the Fayum deposits.

i-7be57db163d3aca3853bbac475f85de8-elephant-evolution-knight.jpg


"Evolution of the Elephant" by Charles R. Knight. From bottom to top: Moeritherium, Palaeomastodon, and Mammuthus. From Century magazine.


This was a much simplified version of what was then thought to represent the straight-line evolution of elephants. There were a lot of fossils between Palaeomastodon and Mammuthus. Even then, though, the image many paleontologists wanted to invoke was a straight line. Genera like Mammut, Deinotherium, and Platybelodon (named in 1928) were pushed off to the side as failed experiments in elephant evolution. Evolutionary diagrams of elephant evolution in technical journals did show branching patterns, that is true, but it was the branch that led to living forms, the "winners in life's race", that were always of the most important. The rest could be relegated to the trash bin of earth's history.

More like this

A restoration of the head of Pyrotherium. From W.B. Scott's A History of Land Mammals in the Western Hemisphere.I do not remember much from my elementary school education, but there are a few fragments that have stuck with me. One day in 6th grade geography, for example, Mr. McCutcheon asked the…
A progressive "march" of elephant evolution as portrayed in Ingersoll's The Life of Animals. From left to right Moeritherium, Palaeomastodon, Gomphotherium ("Trilophodon"), Mammut americanum (American mastodon), Elephas maximus (Asian elephant).Every now and then I like to browse through old…
A restoration of Eritreum compared to the larger Gomphotherium. From Shoshani et al. (2009). Before I loved dinosaurs, I loved elephants. I would run around the backyard with my little pith helmet on, firing my "elephant mover" to herd the imaginary pachyderms. (At the time I did not understand…
The skull of Gomphotherium, from Barbour's paper.Regular readers of this blog are well aware that the "March of Progress", a depiction of the single-file evolution of humans from an ape ancestor, is a biological bugbear that refuses to go away. Even though the Great Chain of Being ceased to be…

Ha! So much more interesting that it's really branch & prune, branch & prune.

Are you going to show us the corrected version?

Monado; In due course. Right now I am still doing research, so I want to make sure I have the most up-to-date information. I will keep your request in mind, though, and will write up such a post when I can (and if I forget at least it will be in the book!).