Image:Canadian Museum of Nature
Well, the paternity tests are in and the results are not looking very good. It turns out that arctic foxes are not monogamous after all. When resources are abundant, populations of breeding pairs expand and the female arctic foxes mate with other males, cheating on their partner. In fact, researchers have found that with abundant food (in this case geese) up to 31% of the pups in a population were the result of extra-pair relations. They hypothesize this genetic flow is important for maintaining genetic diversity.
Source:
C Camerona, D Berteauxa, F Dufresneb. Spatial variation in food availability predicts extrapair paternity in the arctic fox. Behavioral Ecology. 22 (6): 1364-1373, 2011.
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Do Individual Females Differ Intrinsically in Their Propensity to Engage in Extra-Pair Copulations?
A repost
Now, this is truly important applied science, in PLoS.
While many studies have investigated the occurrence of extra-pair paternity in wild populations of birds, we still know surprisingly…
tags: researchblogging.org, superb starling, Spreo superbus, Lamprotornis superbus, birds, behavior, infidelity
Superb starling, Lamprotornis (Spreo) superbus.
These small birds are commonly found in open woodlands and savannahs throughout Northeast Africa.
Image: Hogle Zoo, Utah.
While it is…
tags: blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus, extrapair fertilization, genetic benefit hypothesis, genetic similarity, plumage color, birdsong, ornithology, behavioral ecology
Blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus.
Image: Paul Hillion, 26 April 2008.
Even though most bird species form social bonds with their…
tags: researchblogging.org, splendid fairy-wren, Malurus splendens,sexual dichromatism, evolution, behavior, promiscuity, social monogamy
Male splendid fairy-wren, Malurus splendens.
Image: Pete Morris (Surfbirds.com). [screensaver size]
Everyone is familiar with sexual dichromatism in birds;…
There's a bit of a disconnect between your title and second line and the research and rest of your post.
They cheat so hard they end up changing species, apparently!
Ooops! Thank you for catching that! Never attempt writing a blog about foxes in the middle of an exciting TV show about wolves.
LOL @ Anton
...But yes -- what species ARE we discussing, here? Seems like wolves have nowt to do with this. And I was never under the impression that foxes mated monogamously or exclusively, anyway!
This kind of thing always bothered me. Whenever there's a scientific finding that some species isn't as monogamous as we thought, not only do we use the word "cheating" (which, to me, seems to be a little presumptuous when we've never even sat down and had a nice conversation with the animals, never mind asked them their marital status) but we say that it's the *females* who are cheating, when logically, males have to be cheating too (unless there is a massive sex imbalance, and there are a lot of loner males out there -- at least enough to father 31% of the offspring).
Now, I realize this is mostly because the babies hang with the mom, and get raised in that family group (assuming there is one in a particular species), so parental relationships are interpreted in that light. But still, they talk about the ladies cheating, rather than describing it as a matrilineal, polyandrous situation. When those words would be just as accurate.
My pulled-out-of-thin-air theory is that this is because all humans have a secret prediliction for soap operas, and consequently find the "cheating spouse" language more appealing. ;-)
with about 90% of the mammals ( not excluding human) having the males letting the females do all the donkeywork of raiding the young one can hardly speak of the females "cheating"
it's an attitude of males thinking that just delivering their sperm is about 90% of getting offspring.