Further Adventures in Geological Cowardice

Yesterday I blogged about how the National Park Service is selling a young-Earth creationist book about the Grand Canyon in its stores. Today the Washington Post wrote an article on the subject. It contains a response from the National Park Service, which I find pretty unbelievable. They claim that they are in fact reviewing the matter. The review was supposed to be done in February, but it's been delayed while lawyers at the Interior and Justice Departments "tackle the issue." No deadline is set for the decision, and the book will continue to be sold until one is made.

Tackle the issue? Do these folks really need an extra eight months (and counting) to recognize that the Grand Canyon is millions of years old, and was not formed in Noah's Flood?

The book has been moved from the science section to the inspirational section. But from what I know about it, it's not claiming to offer inspiration but facts. The intellectual cowardice continues.

Tags

More like this

David Appell points to some depressing news about how our government deals with science. In August 2003, the Grand Canyon National Park Superintendent tried to block the sale of a book in National Park Service stores. The book claims that the Grand Canyon formed in Noah's Flood. No vague ambiguity…
Gary Trudeau sticks it to the creationists in today's Doonesbury. The topic of the day is the sad fact that the U.S. National Parks Service sells in its Grand Canyon gift shop a book that offers a Biblical chronology for the world's creation, a fact that makes it very hard to explain how the canyon…
You might not know this, but, due to pressure from Republicans beholden to batshit lunatic creationists theological conservatives, park rangers at the Grand Canyon are not allowed to discuss how old the Grand Canyon is. Really. I'm not making this up. From PEER: Grand Canyon National Park is…
That's the title of this article from the August 2006 issue of GeoTimes. The article is by Kathryn Hansen. The article details some of the difficulties faced by national parks and museums in communicating science to the public. It begins as follows: STOP: This exhibit is about animal thinking.…

It's amazing, as a former US Forest Service biologist how political leadership puppets the agencies around. I'm surprised the president doesn't form the flat-earth consortium. It's painful for scientists when pseudo-science rules the roost. Science is non-ideological; politics as we know is. The two are conflated now more than ever. I quit the Bush administration and won in court for an unemployment claim. That's an example of what we're dealing with here. My fingers are crossed.

It's just politics - they're waiting for the election. Not that it's a good reason, but it's the reason.

John Sladek years ago parodied the whole appeasement approach to Young-Earthers by having Flat-Earthers successfully put into law the non-existence of geosynchronous orbits. To prevent telecommunications disaster the satellite makers made the comsats self-aware, hence legally able to assert their own existence.

Appeasement will not do. The Young-Earth belief is absurd non-science and non-sense and should be legally recognised as such. No more "equal time" BS in the Courts.