Farewell, Ernst

More like this

I've finished the 5th chapter of The Structure of Evolutionary Theory, but I don't have time to put up a review right now. But I do want to comment on a funny passage: I ran into Ernst Mayr as I was completing this chapter and asked if he had ever met de Vries. "No," he said, "botanists and…
Harvard announced today that Ernst Mayr, the venerable and legendary evolutionary biologist who made his home there for so long, died yesterday at the age of 100. Science magazine published a retrospective, written by Mayr himself, on his 80 years as a scientist last July after his 100th birthday…
On the heels of finding out that Ernst Mayr died, I also just read that Ossie Davis has died. Ossie Davis, husband of actress Ruby Dee, was a brilliant actor, playwright, writer and civil rights activist. If you don't recognize his name, you almost surely would recognize his face and his deep,…
Evolgen has a has a nice little post poking fun at the late Ernst Mayr. A few comments. 1) R.A. Fisher, J.B.S. Haldane and J.M. Smith were trained as mathematical/physical scientists before their biological days. Fisher did work in statistical mechanics before he went off to Rothamsted.…

It is difficult to offer appropriate comment on the loss of such a giant in our field. Mayr's books have been an inspiration to me for many years. We need more such minds - with his ability to express what's in them.

He'll be missed sorely.

By the bunyip (not verified) on 05 Feb 2005 #permalink

Carl Zimmer in Discover Magazine wrote:
"The Avida team makes their software freely available on the Internet, and creationists have downloaded it over and over again in hopes of finding a fatal flaw. While theyve uncovered a few minor glitches, Ofria says they have yet to find anything serious. We literally have an army of thousands of unpaid bug testers, he says. What more could you want?"

The fatal flaw is that this simulation bears absolutely no resemblance to what actually goes on in nature. Its an exercise in nothing. Its no different than when Ptolemy proposed a theory for the motions of the bodies in the universe that placed the earth at the center and then derived a complex system of epicycles and built mechanical orreries to simulate these proposed motions and to *prove* that this is what was really happening.
It seems self-evident to me, and it should to all other observers that living organisms are far more technologically advanced and organized than any machine that humans can build. It stands to reason that an intelligence greater than human intelligence was required to construct them. In what dimension can random chance and accidental occurrences produce what the human mind is incapable of producing?
It just seems so incredibly simple to me.

Christopher Zeeman. quoted by Ian Stewart in "Does God Play Dice?" wrote:
"First came the astronomers observing the motions of the heavenly bodies and collecting data. Secondly came the mathematicians inventing mathematical notation to describe the motions and fit the data. Thirdly came the technicians making mechanical models to simulate those mathematical constructions. Fourthly came generations of students who learned their astronomy from these machines. Fifthly came scientists whose imagination had been so blinkered by generations of such learning that they actually believed that this was how the heavens worked. Sixthly came the authorities who insisted upon the received dogma. And so the human race was fooled into accepting the Ptolemaic System for a thousand years."

On the death of Ernst Mayr:

As John Donne wrote, "every man's death diminishes me, because I am involved with mankind". Mayr lived a long and full life and should be applauded for his accomplishments.
This does not diminish the fact that he was an intellectual tyrant who was wrong in just about everything he said.
I was so glad that Barbara McClintock lived to see her views vindicated and her colleagues to admit they were wrong. Likewise, I'm glad for Mayr that he didn't live long enough to see the day that his theories would be shown to be incorrect.
While I mourn the passing of any man, I also hope that his views on evolution die with him.

Charlie Wagner
http://enigma.charliewagner.com

I am saddened to see how Charlie is not only using Mayr's thread to present his ignorant comments on Avida but also his viewpoints of Mayr. There are times Charlie where it is wisest to just keep your mouth shut lest you like to portray yourself in a very negative light here.

Sad but elucidating nevertheless... It shows us what kind of 'man' Charlie is.

Booo to you charlie, you ignorant pile of feces! I hope your jebus infests your bowels with a million hungry varmints. Seriously, if you want to put forth your' never-ending nonsensical arguments, there are better ways.

By ceibatree (not verified) on 07 Feb 2005 #permalink