My latest Dissection column for Wired.com takes on the old tug-of-war between Nature and Artifice. As I write in my new book Microcosm: E. coli and the New Science of Life, scientists began to manufacture strange versions of the microbe in the early 1970s. In 1974, for example, scientists engineered E. coli carrying DNA from a frog. The difference between such "unnatural" bacteria and "natural" ones may seem obvious, but today the dividing line is surprisingly tricky to draw, and will only get trickier. In my new column, I describe the first systematic attempt to do so. Check it out.
(Image from National Gallery of Art)
- Log in to post comments
More like this
Imagine that mad scientists defied nature and violated the barriers between species. They injected human DNA into non-human creatures, altering their genomes into chimeras--unnatural fusions of man and beast. The goal of the scientists was to enslave these creatures, to exploit their cellular…
Jessica asked if I think viruses are alive. John has given his opinion. I will waffle, but I hope in an interesting way. The hard thing about answering that question is that we'd have to agree on what it means to be alive.
We all have a sense that we know what's alive and what's not, but I think…
If you're just tuning in, on Tuesday I offered five free signed copies of my new book Microcosm: E. coli and the New Science of Life to readers if they sent in a question. I was quite stoked to see the huge reaction. I can tell from the quality of the questions that the sheer volume was not just…
From the blog of Steven Johnson, author of The Ghost Map and Mind Wide Open
Go Buy Microcosm Right Now
Carl Zimmer may be my favorite science writer around today (others seem to agree), so I'm excited to report that his new book Microcosm: E. coli and the New Science of Life hit the shelves…
Fascinating stuff.
Sounds roughly similar to the constant updating done by the programmers of anti-virus software.
But let's be frank - all of these interesting articles are just ploys to get me to buy Microcosm as soon as it's out! :-)
And your cunning plan has worked ...
Hi...I read your article and thought it was really interesting. But there was one thing I don't really understand:
Why is the border between natural and artificial real and important?
Aren't humans part of nature? And even the manipulations we do are just piggy-backing on what happens in nature--I would have thought that genetic engineering is just much more precise than natural or artificial selection. How do you define artificial?
Your example about explorers in North America made me wonder about what we consider "artificial".
That and the other version of The Human Condition are two of my all time favorite paintings.