More on Needless Bioterrorism Hysteria

Recently, I wrote about how bioterrorism seems to freak people out needlessly. A Man With a Ph.D. makes some other good points:

Biological terrorism is scary because it is easy to imagine doomsday while few really understand the difficulty of working with any sort of pathogen. Or even simple bacteria.

Governments around the world have spent billions using experts in the best labs tn order to weaponize pathogenic agents. It is an extremely difficult problem. Things like how do you make sure it kills the ones you want instead of your own people come into play.

A home hacker would not be able to easily work with a deadly pathogen. Because they are deadly.

Really special care must be used with them. Especially since many only grow in human cells, requiring very expensive, specialized equipment and costly growth medium. Home hackers are working with easy, simple things like bacteria that are not deadly in themselves.

How about putting a 'bad' gene in to a safe bacteria? First, few things in life are that easy. It often takes many different protein products to evade our immune system and allow a pandemic to proceed.

Trying to get some Ebola gene working in bacteria sounds scary. But putting any new gene into a bacteria like E. coli almost always makes that bacteria much less likely to survive in the wild. Bacteria have been selected in nature to replicate rapidly. Anything that hampers that is usually quickly lost.

And I liked the conclusion:

But I think it is much more likely that a devastating pandemic will come from our intense interactions with livestock, such as large factory farms, and other animals (i.e. zoonotic) than from something specifically created.

Actually, other than the anthrax attacks, the largest bioterrorism attack in the U.S. was when a cult in Oregon released Salmonella into a buffet. Interestingly, no one realized that this was an attack for many months--people thought it was just ordinary food contamination.

'Ordinary' bugs kill us just fine; we don't need to go looking under the bed.

Tags

More like this

In case you missed it, over the past couple of days there have been reports of an outbreak of Ebola hemorrhagic  fever virus in Uganda. As of this writing, the most recent report I've seen puts the death toll at 16, with a few other suspected cases. Ebola is terrifying for a number of reasons - it'…
I started writing a lengthy response to a reader comment on one of Heather's posts, but decided it could use a post of it's own. The question: As to being pathogenic, is it possible that many bacteria are pathogenic if given sufficient opportunity? [snip] It seems largely to me that the line…
In my piece with DarkSyde yesterday, I mentioned a bioterrorist attack with Salmonella that took place in Oregon in the 1980s. This is an organism that you've all certainly encountered (though hopefully didn't get sickened by), and it's certainly not one that's commonly thought of as a potential…
Several bloggers are raising concerns about the FBIâs case against Dr. Bruce Ivins, who was suspected of carrying out the 2001 anthrax attacks and who died from an acetaminophen overdose hours before he was supposed to meet with government officials about the case. In particular, Revere explains…

My money for our next devastating pandemic would be on woo peddlers convincing people vaccines cause autism and don't work to boot.

By JThompson (not verified) on 04 Jun 2009 #permalink

@JThompson, Oh, you mean like the anti-measles vaccine people in Britain that are getting 30+ kids killed/year because their parents refuse to get the immunized.....

Mike, you're going to have to stop being so rational. With your calm explanations, pointing out the false basis of paranoia and alarmist reactions...no one will read your stuff. : D. Nicely presented.

By Mike Olson (not verified) on 04 Jun 2009 #permalink